🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dfw.singles
Article #134

Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL

#134
From: scott bence
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 1997 00:00
17 lines
2221 bytes
> 85 percent of the couples have a height difference of 4 to 5 inches.  Which
> means that women are looking for guys who are above average in height
> (but not too tall). 
> Etherman

[No flames, just wondering]
What would be meant by "too tall"? Ladies? Anybody, Your thoughts?

We can change certain aspects of ourselves, height would not be one of
them. Myself, would not care how tall the lady is. I would assume
*serious* ladies would feel the same about the guy,  You dont really
notice physical things about the other person *after* a relationship is
underway. 

scot bence
P.S. New to the group.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public
X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public
X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public
X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public
X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public
X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public
From: scott bence <sbence@fastlane.net>
Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
Date: 1997/01/01
Message-ID: <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net>
X-Deja-AN: 207141001
references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net>
content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
organization: National Knowledge Network
mime-version: 1.0
newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe
x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I)