Article View: dfw.singles
Article #136Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
From: Etherman
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 00:00
33 lines
2561 bytes
2561 bytes
scott bence <sbence@fastlane.net> wrote in article <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net>... > > 85 percent of the couples have a height difference of 4 to 5 inches. Which > > means that women are looking for guys who are above average in height > > (but not too tall). > > Etherman > > [No flames, just wondering] > What would be meant by "too tall"? Ladies? Anybody, Your thoughts? I guess too tall is anyone over 2 standard deviations from the average. > We can change certain aspects of ourselves, height would not be one of > them. Myself, would not care how tall the lady is. I would assume > *serious* ladies would feel the same about the guy, You dont really > notice physical things about the other person *after* a relationship is > underway. > > scot bence > P.S. New to the group. A short time ago I realized that every woman I've asked out, with just one exception, has been taller than me. I don't know why, but I'm attracted to tall, thin women with small breasts. -- Etherman
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<01bbf862$a3ba4e40$3ef042ce@etherman.mdc.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public From: "Etherman" <etherman@mdc.net> Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL Date: 1997/01/02 Message-ID: <01bbf862$a3ba4e40$3ef042ce@etherman.mdc.net> X-Deja-AN: 207209840 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> organization: Illumanati newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe