🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dfw.singles
Article #150

Re: BEING SHORT

#150
From: Bigus
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 1996 00:00
38 lines
3294 bytes
In article <32C4B50A.4D40@herald.infi.net>, fmartin@herald.infi.net 
says...
> Frank Calderon wrote:  
> 
> As someone who's 5'9"  (OK, OK, I'm actually 5' 8-1/2") I thought I'd throw in 
> this little bit o' info:  
> 
> 20/20 (on ABC) had a story about short men and their dating problems this 
> Friday night (think their producers might be reading some of these posts?).  
> And guess what they found?  Most women prefer tall men (surprise, surprise)!  
> 
> They had a group of men in a room, with one short man in the middle, and a 
> group of women in another room looking through a two-way mirror at the men.  
> The women were asked which men they would date.  None picked the short 
> guy--even after they were told the short guy was an M.D. who had written a 
> successful book, yatta, yatta.  
> 
> They did this several times with different guys (including different short 
> guys) and different women.  In one particular case, they were told the short 
> guy (who happened to be 5 feet tall this time) was a venture capitalist who 
> became a millionaire at 25--and they STILL wouldn't go out with him!  
> 
> Unbelievably shallow, I think...
> 

I just watched the same report. They actualy used tall women (they said 
so), so what did you expect. If they had some short women selecting among 
tall men you would see some shallowness of a different variety. It seems 
like this report and so much of the other talk I have heard on this 
subject seems to focus on how tall people feel about short people. It 
seems they don't think the feelings of short people about short people 
are significant.

If they had switched because he was a doctor or a millionare, would this 
not also be very shallow?

John
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MPG.d2e66c828b770df989760@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <32C31715.40AB@radix.net> <32C324A5.29D3@who.net> <32C4B50A.4D40@herald.infi.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public
X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public
X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public
X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public
X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public
X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public
X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629
X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public
From: bigus@ix.netcom.com (Bigus)
Subject: Re: BEING SHORT
Date: 1996/12/28
Message-ID: <MPG.d2e66c828b770df989760@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
X-Deja-AN: 206497491
references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <32C31715.40AB@radix.net> <32C324A5.29D3@who.net> <32C4B50A.4D40@herald.infi.net>
organization: Netcom
x-netcom-date: Sat Dec 28  7:10:35 PM CST 1996
newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.personals,la.personals