Article View: dfw.singles
Article #154Re: BEING SHORT
From: James R. Searcy
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 00:00
63 lines
3553 bytes
3553 bytes
John, I liked your assessment of people who are shorter than average. You may have something there. JR In <MPG.d2b64df7b6d3bd2989748@nntp.ix.netcom.com> bigus@ix.netcom.com (Bigus) writes: > >In article <59cg9s$jd$1@nuke.csu.net>, channon@wahoo.csu.net says... >> John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: >> : In article <58v56r$l1e$3@nuke.csu.net>, >> : Marla Channon <channon@wahoo.csu.net> wrote: >> : >Tallness isn't a huge factor in who I chose as a boyfriend. Some of my >> : >ex-boyfriends were 5'5" or 5'6". I'm 5' 6 1/2" tall. Height is not that >> : >big a deal. My fiance is 5' 10 1/2". Short women go for short >> : >men--many times. I have a male friend who's 5' 5" who recently married >> : >a woman who's 5' 3". >> >> : So, has anyone used the reason "Too Tall" to not have a relationship? >> >> : Smid >> >> You're right. Some women are biased about height. But for you men below >> 5'6", to hell with the women who won't go out with a short man. Short >> men are just as cute as tall men. Many leading celebrity men, including >> Robert Redford are short men--below 5'6". There's nothing wrong with >> being short, men. Short men will get married anyway as much as tall men. >> >> Marla >> >I am 6'6" and have been given the excuse many times that I am too tall, >but then again I have been approached many times for no other reason than >my hight as well. It is a superficial thing and it is annoying to have >obviously totaly wrong women proposition you, and even more so to be >rejected out of hand for it. > >Hight does have its effect on personality. Tall people are generaly much >more reserved, especialy women. Shorter people seem to compinsate for >short stature by being more bubbly and dinamic. If you were to brows the >alt.tall.support forum you would hear little else. We tall ones seem to >have trouble connecting with each other because we are more reserved. > >Over all, I would be the first to admit it is an advantage in numbers, if >not quality. > >John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5a6int$6rb@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <329339DE.21E3@necropolis.com> <56v9ut$kgd@sf18.dseg.ti.com> <58v56r$l1e$3@nuke.csu.net> <E2oC2z.w4@ftel.co.uk> <59cg9s$jd$1@nuke.csu.net> <MPG.d2b64df7b6d3bd2989748@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public X-Google-Thread: 114c98,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid114c98,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public From: ridge@ix.netcom.com(James R. Searcy) Subject: Re: BEING SHORT Date: 1996/12/29 Message-ID: <5a6int$6rb@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 206646080 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <329339DE.21E3@necropolis.com> <56v9ut$kgd@sf18.dseg.ti.com> <58v56r$l1e$3@nuke.csu.net> <E2oC2z.w4@ftel.co.uk> <59cg9s$jd$1@nuke.csu.net> <MPG.d2b64df7b6d3bd2989748@nntp.ix.netcom.com> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Sun Dec 29 2:02:05 PM CST 1996 newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,alt.vegas.personals,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.personals,la.personals