Article View: dfw.singles
Article #160Re: BEING SHORT
From: Bigus
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 1996 00:00
70 lines
5143 bytes
5143 bytes
In article <59e9je$l4t@trotsky.cig.mot.com>, hansenlw@cig.mot.com says... > In article <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net>, Dan Scheraga <scheraga@webspan.net> writes: > > Tommy the Tourist wrote: > > > > > > In article <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov>, > > > Robert Kutschke <kutschke@fnpspa.fnal.gov> wrote: > > > > 33 specified a minimum height of 5'7'' or more > > > > 3 specified a minimum height of 5'5'' or 5'6'' > > > > 4 specified no minimum height > > > > > > These figures sound right-on. _Esquire_ just did a story about men, and > > > they mentioned that in a study of personals ads, almost all women required > > > men to be tall. > > > > > > This is a bummer for short men. We are all born into this world with > > > various gifts and various difficulties. > > > > > > > Bummer is an understatement. > > But I...and most every other guy I know tall or short, require women to be slim, or at least not > > obese...when us short guys who know damn well what it's like to be ignored for such a > > superficial reason keep physical requirements for our mates, it's hypocrisy. Obesity doesn't > > stop women from wanting taller guys, and that's hypocrisy, too. But with the thrust of several > > eons of natural selection behind it, who can stop it? > > Humans are animals and we've got no one to blame but ourselves. > > I'm not sure "hypocrisy" is really the right word. I am not a tall/large man, > and I prefer to date women who are close to my size. I find it hard to be > attracted to extremely tall/obese women. I do not think that that is shallow. > I have very few physical "requirements": > 1) Must be female > 2) close (3-4 years) to my age > 3) Not too much larger than me (I would include "too much smaller" as > well, but that would bring me into the range of dwarfs) > 4) Drooling, spasmatic conditions are probably not a plus. > We all know who we're attracted to. I don't think its "hypocrisy" to have > physical preferences even though physical preferences of the opposite sex > occasionally (or not so occasionally) exclude you from being a potential mate. > -- > "Hardware : The parts of a computer system that can be kicked" > ============================================================================== > Len Hansen | > ============================================================================== > I am 6'6", PREFER women over 5'7", PREFER brunettes, PREFER ... Is it so strange to want to be with someone who you can kiss without a step, to snuggle with someone whos body proportions fit with yours, to neither crush nor be crushed during passionate sessions? These are mostly sexual things, but you don't know how difficult it is to have hight difference untill you walk through the world a foot taller than the average woman. It is not fatal, but it is an issue that will never go away, one that must be delt with when doing something as simple as walking and talking. When a short woman wants a tall man, I am unimpressed, even annoyed. When a tall woman wants a tall man, I say looky here! So is my choice realy that much larger than yours? (forgive the pun) Push all these buttons and I am sure to respond. If you dont have them all, then you had better find ways to push the remaining ones well enough to get my attention. Once you have it, you have also better have many of the other things I want. That is a fact of life. Accept it and work with it. There are plenty out there with some sort of tall fetish. Personally, I think it best when people FAVOR someone their own size. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MPG.d2b6ae4819a6438989749@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <59e9je$l4t@trotsky.cig.mot.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114c98,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid114c98,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public From: bigus@ix.netcom.com (Bigus) Subject: Re: BEING SHORT Date: 1996/12/25 Message-ID: <MPG.d2b6ae4819a6438989749@nntp.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 205952267 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <59e9je$l4t@trotsky.cig.mot.com> organization: Netcom x-netcom-date: Wed Dec 25 4:51:30 PM PST 1996 newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,alt.vegas.personals,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.personals,la.personals