🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <49319301$1@nntp.zianet.com>,
 "Soumay Nonay" <soumaynonay@igginbay.omcay> wrote:

> Al wrote:
> >> In article <49318cb5$1@nntp.zianet.com>,
> >> "Soumay Nonay" <soumaynonay@igginbay.omcay> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Al wrote:
> >>>>> In article
> >>>>> <24f096ea-a674-4f7a-a916-7ddb91a6674d@j32g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
> >>>>> bushlyed <bushlyed@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 29, 11:33 am, 4...@mydaja.com wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0600, Kenny Blankenship
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <Kenny.Blankens...@PainfulElimination.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Dude, let it go. Your anger is consuming you.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A study showed Conservitives were more happy with life, and
> >>>>>>> Liberals weren't as happy.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Was that study done before or after November 4th?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And by the way, wonderful quote from Abraham Lincoln:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Allow the president to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he
> >>>>>> shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him
> >>>>>> to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for
> >>>>>> such a purpose - and you allow him to make war at pleasure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The smart thing to do, a la Clinton, is *don't ask for
> >>>>> permission*.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bush screwed up, fell into a trap. Those clever dems lied for
> >>>>> years about the "imminent threat", and when Bush fell for it,
> >>>>> they happily voted in the majority to "allow him to make war at
> >>>>> pleasure".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Then at the earliest possible time, thy cleverly decided to take
> >>>>> the other side, the one they told us was winning handily, while
> >>>>> our troops were committing atrocities and murdering innocents in
> >>>>> cold blood.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "This war is lost"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Murdering in cold blood"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The previously hawkish democrats borrowed heavily from the
> >>>>> language of the insurgents, Islamists and the like to attack the
> >>>>> president, to try and force a surrender.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The democrats stopped just shy of praising Allah, but those who
> >>>>> praise Allah praised the democrats for their fervent support for
> >>>>> their aims, their right-thinking ways. Allah akhbar!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Of course, with the New Power and the New Politic - peace is at
> >>>>> hand?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Think again. Look at that quote from Lincoln and ask yourself if
> >>>>> there's *anything* followers would deny this man if the US was
> >>>>> provoked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It would be seen as not only an attack on America, but worse
> >>>>> still, an attack on Obama.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The dogs of war run wild under democrats, they have no problem
> >>>>> with violence, especially our emerging progressive fascists.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Their biggest problem these days is figuring out *which side
> >>>>> they're on*, and they, like tribal islamists, will switch in the
> >>>>> middle of a war.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tribals switch to save their own skin, liberal hawks switch for
> >>>>> political gain, and they have slavish, unquestioning followers who
> >>>>> have convinced themselves that history first noticed Saddam around
> >>>>> 2002 or so.
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't seem to be working out that well for you.
> >>
> >> No, actually I'm quite well off, thank you.
> 
> Yet, you seem quite upset. 

Was just posting a little history, but thank you for your concern.