🚀 go-pugleaf

On Nov 29, 11:16 am, Al <albert.finney...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <24f096ea-a674-4f7a-a916-7ddb91a66...@j32g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
>  bushlyed <bushl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 11:33 am, 4...@mydaja.com wrote:
> > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 09:34:31 -0600, Kenny Blankenship
>
> > > <Kenny.Blankens...@PainfulElimination.com> wrote:
> > > >Dude, let it go.  Your anger is consuming you.
>
> > > A study showed Conservitives were more happy with life, and Liberals
> > > weren't as happy.
>
> > Was that study done before or after November 4th?
>
> > And by the way, wonderful quote from Abraham Lincoln:
>
> > Allow the president to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he shall
> > deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so
> > whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such a purpose
> > - and you allow him to make war at pleasure.
>
> The smart thing to do, a la Clinton, is *don't ask for permission*.
>
> Bush screwed up, fell into a trap. Those clever dems lied for years about
> the "imminent threat", and when Bush fell for it, they happily voted in the
> majority to "allow him to make war at pleasure".
>
> Then at the earliest possible time, thy cleverly decided to take the other
> side, the one they told us was winning handily, while our troops were
> committing atrocities and murdering innocents in cold blood.
>
> "This war is lost"
>
> "Murdering in cold blood"
>
> The previously hawkish democrats borrowed heavily from the language of the
> insurgents, Islamists and the like to attack the president, to try and force
> a surrender.
>
> The democrats stopped just shy of praising Allah, but those who praise Allah
> praised the democrats for their fervent support for their aims, their
> right-thinking ways. Allah akhbar!
>
> Of course, with the New Power and the New Politic - peace is at hand?
>
> Think again. Look at that quote from Lincoln and ask yourself if there's
> *anything* followers would deny this man if the US was provoked.
>
> It would be seen as not only an attack on America, but worse still, an
> attack on Obama.
>
> The dogs of war run wild under democrats, they have no problem with
> violence, especially our emerging progressive fascists.
>
> Their biggest problem these days is figuring out *which side they're on*,
> and they, like tribal islamists, will switch in the middle of a war.
>
> Tribals switch to save their own skin, liberal hawks switch for political
> gain, and they have slavish, unquestioning followers who have convinced
> themselves that history first noticed Saddam around 2002 or so.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Good post. Well said. You nailed em'.