🚀 go-pugleaf

Dana wrote:
> On Nov 5, 10:18 am, Jer <gd...@airmail.ten> wrote:
> 
>>>> I don't want to police the world, yet at the same time, I would like
>>>> there to be something to help people in places like Darfur.  Real
>>>> help, as in, if you are killing people or burning down their villages,
>>>> trying to starve them out, we kill you.
> 
>>> Not our problem. Not our country.  You want to police the world.
> 
>> The world needs a police force acting under a single
>> international banner, not a U.S. one - and we need a president that
>> offers a good chance of that happening.
> 
> Hello one world government.  Hello global enslavement.
> Goodbye united States of America.

I don't see it that way.


> 
>>>> But I don't want that to be a USA thing, we have found out too many
>>>> times that doesn't work or do any good in the long run.
> 
>>> Yet it always ends up a uS thing.
> 
>>> Just say it... you're in favor of globalism.
> 
>> When it involves more than the U.S., yes I am.
> 
> Then you are the enemy.
> What happened to your fondness for the Constitution and national
> sovereignty?

Nothing's happened to my fondness for those tenets of Americanism.  I 
just don't believe they have to be mutually exclusive.  Yes, it has 
seemed that way in the past, but I don't believe it has to be.  I 
believe our national sovereignty should be enhanced by the Constitution, 
and our relationship with other nations be enhanced by our behavior on 
the world stage.  Neither has been the norm for the past eight years.


> 
> 
>>> Obama said it last night:
>>> "And to all those watching tonight from beyond our shores, from
>>> parliaments and palaces, to those who are huddled around radios in the
>>> forgotten corners of the world, our stories are singular, but our
>>> destiny is shared, and a new dawn of American leadership is at hand."
> 
>> I'm glad to hear it.  I sincerely hope it's true.
> 
> I don't think there's much scuba diving in a FEMA camp.



-- 
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'