Article View: dfw.singles
Article #169Re: BEING SHORT
From: Stranger
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 00:00
50 lines
3690 bytes
3690 bytes
On Wed, 18 Dec 1996 20:30:11 -0500, Dan Scheraga <scheraga@webspan.net> wrote: >Tommy the Tourist wrote: >> >> In article <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov>, >> Robert Kutschke <kutschke@fnpspa.fnal.gov> wrote: >> > 33 specified a minimum height of 5'7'' or more >> > 3 specified a minimum height of 5'5'' or 5'6'' >> > 4 specified no minimum height >> >> These figures sound right-on. _Esquire_ just did a story about men, and >> they mentioned that in a study of personals ads, almost all women required >> men to be tall. >> >> This is a bummer for short men. We are all born into this world with >> various gifts and various difficulties. >> > >Bummer is an understatement. >But I...and most every other guy I know tall or short, require women to be slim, or at least not >obese...when us short guys who know damn well what it's like to be ignored for such a >superficial reason keep physical requirements for our mates, it's hypocrisy. Obesity doesn't >stop women from wanting taller guys, and that's hypocrisy, too. But with the thrust of several >eons of natural selection behind it, who can stop it? >Humans are animals and we've got no one to blame but ourselves. We're only animals to the extent that we can't/don't THINK. Sure, most men (myself included) find slender women more attractive than the overweight variety. I suppose most women find tall men more attractive than the short variety. None of this is carved in stone, however, like you sound as though it is. Where you're condemning yourself is in the use of the word "require". I guess a number of people *do* REQUIRE a certain physical type. I say such people are fixated, and not truly open to endless other possibilities. There's any number of things that make people attractive to one another. Physical appearance is just the most immediate, superficial thing. It's also the thing that ultimately means the LEAST, precisely BECAUSE of its superficiality. If people aren't willing to look beneath skin-deep appearances, they aren't IMO worth getting to know. Stranger aka Stephen C. Smith
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32ba238a.469257902@nntp.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 114c98,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid114c98,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public From: scsmith@ix.netcom.com (Stranger) Subject: Re: BEING SHORT Date: 1996/12/20 Message-ID: <32ba238a.469257902@nntp.ix.netcom.com> X-Deja-AN: 205038351 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Birmingham, Alabama - USA x-netcom-date: Thu Dec 19 11:42:01 PM CST 1996 mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: scsmith@ix.netcom.com newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,alt.vegas.personals,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.personals,la.personals