🚀 go-pugleaf

On Nov 9, 9:38 pm, Lars Eighner <use...@larseighner.com> wrote:
> In our last episode, <F9ednSwC0NH7xorUnZ2dnUVZ_j-dn...@earthlink.com>, the
> lovely and talented slydrule broadcast on alt.politics:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "bushlyed" <bushl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:ebfa46a6-5d7b-4e3e-ba44-30e35b3334fb@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> > On Nov 9, 1:49 am, Dana <LimoD...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Nov 8, 4:50 pm, bushlyed <bushl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > I have seen the factcheck.org's copy of the certificate and it has a
> >> > raised seal.
>
> >> Factcheck.org is sposored by the Annenberg group, which Obama
> >> represented in the 90s.
>
> >> I'd say their conflict of interest is quite clear.
>
> >>The only thing quite clear is that you are an idiot
> > kettle....black?
> >>Are you saying that factcheck.org forged the birth certificate or that
> >>the Anneberg group headed by solid Republicans is in the tank for
> >>Obama
> > Again, the certificate on factcheck.org is a duplicate that was issued in
> > 2007.
>
> That doesn't matter.  *Any* certification of birth by the state of Hawai'i
> must be accepted as fact by all the states, as it was by the US State
> Department when they issued Obama's passport.
>
> > This is the only copy of the birth certificate we've seen.  It appears to
> > be authentic but its not the same as the original document that would
> > prove he was born in the hospital in Hawaii.
>
> Jimmy Carter was the first president born in a hospital.  Were all the
> previous presidents not qualified?  There is no requirement to be born in a
> hospital, and there is no "original."  Any certificate of birth by the state
> of Hawai'i must be recognized according to the 'full faith and credit
> clause' of the US Constitution.
>
> > Personally, I think this is just another conspiracy theory like Loose
> > Change, but the copy of the birth certificate is not going to stop the
> > theorists.
>
> If they hate the Constitution that much, they will just have to lump it.
>


The more I think about it, the more I say go on people, keep sprouting
your looney theories for the whole American people to hear

You did that against Clinton, that he killed Vince Foster, that he
killed people at an airport, that he did this, that he did that, that
he was involved in questionable land deals (when he and Hillary were
the only yuppies to have lost money in real estate in the 1980s)

Now, in the words of Ronald Reagan, "there they go again"

Look in the sky, it's a Muslim, no it's a socialist, no it's a
communist, no it's a Kenyan

Rant on and the fair American people in the middle will be even more
willing to give this young man a chance

And it puts the Republicans in a very awkward position, just like the
vitrolic crowds at McCain and Palin rallies did; their lack of
repudication of their crowds and kooks hurt them tremendously

It was such a contrast with the quarter of a million people in Grant
Park last Tuesday; idealistic, well behaved, positive people, mostly
young who spoke ill of no one, who cheered McCain's gracious
concession and who celebrated in a dignified manner

They are the future of our party; those kooks are the future of their
party