🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<wildbilly-1456E1.23045009032008@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
 Billy <wildbilly@getthe.net> wrote:

> In article 
> <albert.finney000-E6C8BB.20140909032008@news-server.tx.rr.com>,
>  Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> wrote:
> 
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > We'll not revisit the record numbers of democrats 
> > > > > > > > > > > > connected 
> > > > > > > > > > > > to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > the 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Clintons who fell under the purview of jursiprudence, 
> > > > > > > > > > > > but 
> > > > > > > > > > > > we 
> > > > > > > > > > > > will 
> > > > > > > > > > > > note 
> > > > > > > > > > > > that the democrat party represents voter groups which 
> > > > > > > > > > > > traditionally 
> > > > > > > > > > > > have 
> > > > > > > > > > > > higher per-capita criminal convictions than those 
> > > > > > > > > > > > traditionally 
> > > > > > > > > > > > associated with repub's. I'm sure you catch my drift.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Why not? Go for it. As lame as Clinton  was, he looks 
> > > > > > > > > > > like 
> > > > > > > > > > > a 
> > > > > > > > > > > white 
> > > > > > > > > > > knight next to this Bush gang of liars and thieves.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > You're missing my point. I'm referring to voters.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > As to your opinion, it's just that - and by any legal this 
> > > > > > > > > > administration is squeaky clean 
> 
> > > > > > > > > What kind of drugs you on boy, I gotta get me some of them. 
> > > > > > > > > Or 
> > > > > > > > > did  you just go for the full head-on lobotomy?  
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > They brought back the Iran-Contra gang. 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Elliott Abrams pleaded guilty to withholding information from 
> > > > > > > > > Congress, 
> > > > > > > > > then was pardoned bythe first President Bush.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Poindexter was convicted in 1990 on five felony charges
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > I was unaware GW Bush was in power in 1990.
> He hired a convicted felon.

Which is not illegal.


> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > How odd, that we would protect an element of Iraq's Number one 
> > > > > > > > source 
> > > > > > > > of 
> > > > > > > > income.
> The only Ministry or institution that was protected. Not the weapon 
> depots. Not the Assyrian treasure at the Bank of Iraq. Not the Iraqi 
> priceless objects of Iraqi history at the National Museum. The Oil 
> Ministry. There is no oil at the oil ministry. The oil is in the ground.

Yes, it is, but the records, etc in the OM were important to the nation 
of Iraq, since that's how they make money.

We also protected the actual oil, sending in teams before the invasion 
to secure the wells from sabotage.

 
> > > > > > > > > Squeaky clean? You're nuts boy.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Well, boy, by legal measure - indictment, conviction, 
> > > > > > > > incarceration, 
> > > > > > > > you 
> > > > > > > > seem to have failed to make the case.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Sadly, your outrage is not prosecutable.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > compared to previous admins. 
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > If we had a system which relied on 
> > > > > > > > >    public opinion,  
> > > > > > > > > > many critics of this administration would be in the slammer 
> > > > > > > > > > as 
> > > > > > > > > > well.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > You do know that Bush is a very unpopular person don't you?
> If we had a system which relied on public opinion, someone would be 
> throwing a noose over a low branch now.

Yes, for all sorts of imagined malfeasance.


>
> > > > We're evidently using different standards of measure for "corruption" 
> > > > when comparing administrations, mine being actual legal action and 
> > > > conclusions, yours being accusations and theories.
> > > Then you wouldn't mind posting the actual legal actions and 
> > > conclusions for our edification.
> > 
> > Surprisingly hard to find.
> > 
> > 
> > > As far as legal action, the Republican has done a fairly good job of 
> > > blocking any substantive investigations of the for Bush administration 
> > > as opposed to their fish expedition against Clinton. It was only when 
> > > the public realized what a bunch of two-faced scum bags they are that 
> > > things started to change. In any event, tell us of the criminal Clinton 
> > > administration so that we have a basis for comparison.
> > 
> > http://prorev.com/legacy.htm
> 
> You have got to be kidding.
> 
> CRIME STATS
> 
> - Number of individuals and businesses associated with the Clinton 
> machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
> 
> What was the machine and where they officials in the administration or 
> did they just have Clinton's business card?

The answers you seek are contained in history, and you can apply the 
same standards to Bush.

> 
> - Number of these convictions during Clinton's presidency: 33
> 
> Did they have any thing to do with the Clinton administration?
> 
> You are a waste of time, bye.

Best of luck with the lynching.