🚀 go-pugleaf

In article 
<wildbilly-CF15F3.18430207032008@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
 Billy <wildbilly@getthe.net> wrote:

> In article 
> <albert.finney000-965814.07494303032008@news-server.tx.rr.com>,
>  Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> wrote:
> 
> > In article 
> > <wildbilly-623104.22340602032008@c-61-68-245-199.per.connect.net.au>,
> >  Billy <wildbilly@getthe.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > In article 
> > > <albert.finney000-26C38A.07290902032008@news-server.tx.rr.com>,
> > >  Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > We'll not revisit the record numbers of democrats connected to the 
> > > > Clintons who fell under the purview of jursiprudence, but we will note 
> > > > that the democrat party represents voter groups which traditionally 
> > > > have 
> > > > higher per-capita criminal convictions than those traditionally 
> > > > associated with repub's. I'm sure you catch my drift.
> > > 
> > > Why not? Go for it. As lame as Clinton  was, he looks like a white 
> > > knight next to this gang of liars and thieves.
> > 
> > You're missing my point. I'm referring to voters.
> > 
> > As to your opinion, it's just that - and by any legal standard this 
> > administration is squeaky clean 
> What kind of drugs you on boy, I gotta get me some of them. Or did you 
> just go for the full head-on lobotomy?  
> 
> They brought back the Iran-Contra gang. 
> 
> Elliott Abrams pleaded guilty to withholding information from Congress, 
> then was pardoned bythe first President Bush.
> 
> Poindexter was convicted in 1990 on five felony charges

I was unaware GW Bush was in power in 1990.


> Otto Reich, the State Department's top official for Latin America
> 
> Executive privilege and national security concerns keep us from finding 
> out what this government is doing form the secret attendees of Cheney's 
> "Energy Summit" which was followed by de-facto deregulation which lead 
> to the "Clean Air Amendment", "Clean Water Amendment" (of course neither 
> was clean), and the screwing of Californian electrical rate payers.


All charged and jailed on your opinion alone.
 
> Then there was the bald face lying that got us into Iraq.
> 
> Niger yellow cake uranium?

The British intel, or Joe Wilson's report of seeing a top Iraqi official 
in Niger? Granted, Wilson is a proved liar, but he's on your side, right?
 
> Let's not forget the stripping of the Constitution and the loss of the 
> 800 year old right of habeas corpus and the right to a jury of your 
> peers, illegal invasion of everyones privacy (foreign and domestic).

Are you thinking of the "drug war", or do you call Iran frequently?

> 
> Oh and the killing of "SUSPECTED" terrorists and the torturing of 
> "SUSPECTED" terrorists and the very real kidnapping of a Canadian and a 
> German who were tortured.

Oh my.
 
> At present the US is supplying weapons to both Sunni and Shia forces in 
> Iraq, which keeps the violence going and justifies our continued 
> presence and the spending of big bucks, so that Daddy Bush and friends 
> can continue to make big bucks.

Decreasing violence = increased violence.

 
> And the thing that really is the symbol for this administration of 
> thieves, liars, and murders is when we invaded Baghdad, the only part of 
> the infrastructure that was guarded was the Ministry of Oil.

How odd, that we would protect an element of Iraq's Number one source of 
income.

 
> Squeaky clean? You're nuts boy.

Well, boy, by legal measure - indictment, conviction, incarceration, you 
seem to have failed to make the case.

Sadly, your outrage is not prosecutable.

> > compared to previous admins. 
> 
> > If we had a system which relied on 
>    public opinion,  
> > many critics of this administration would be in the slammer as well.
> 
> You do know that Bush is a very unpopular person don't you?

4 out of 5 Islamists, communists and neo-marxist wankers hate the guy. 
You're in good company.

> You must 
> know that. Lunatic Republicans (ask for them by name) are his only 
> supporters. If it was up to popular opinion, this administration would  
> be in prison or the Hague.

So that's it.

You set out to straighten me out about this, and end up making my case 
for me, you weren't even smart enough to mention Libby.

Care to try again?

List the indictments and convictions of the people in and surrounding 
the administration, then compare that list with previous 
administrations, and you will arrive at the same conclusion I just 
offered.

This is really 9th-grade stuff, youngster, are you still in 8th?


(BTW, you, like the other outraged ninny, failed to get the gist, so 
I'll repeat it once again. The democrat voter base is comprised in no 
small part by criminals)