🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <0T4d005lIjo9N34@redshark.goodshow.net>,
 Infamous Other Chris <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:

> Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> wrote:
> > In article <0T4ct4elIqoeN34@redshark.goodshow.net>,
> > Infamous Other Chris <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> >> Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> wrote:
> >> > In article <0T4cr1rtI8vtN34@redshark.goodshow.net>,
> >> > Infamous Other Chris <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom> wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > I couldn't help but notice that, once again, you failed to engage 
> >> >> > even a 
> >> >> > single issue raised by the writer.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Yeah, there's a reason for that. See if you can figure it out.
> >> > 
> >> > You're incapable of addressing ideas on their merit, and would rather 
> >> > retort by rant and angst and call people who upset you poopy-heads?
> >> 
> >> Nope. I didn't think you'd get it.
> >> 
> >> It's like this: if you start a discussion based on a racist
> >> assumption, and then draw people into that discussion to go
> >> back and forth of the merits of said racist assumption, then
> >> you've won already -- the racism is legitimized.
> > 
> > There's your problem, there was a greater point made, but it got lost in 
> > your assumption of racism.
> 
> No, Steve. That wasn't an assumption. You posted all the necessary
> evidence on your own, free from any goading or influence by anyone.

But you never referred to any actual "evidence" other than your own 
declaration.

> There was no greater point. The racism *was* the point.

It's always the point for racialists, always.