🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <0T4da896IlhoN34@redshark.goodshow.net>,
 Infamous Other Chris <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:

> Suburbanaristic <Musselman@wohoo.com> wrote:
> > In article <0T4d9u1iIjavN34@redshark.goodshow.net>,
> > Infamous Other Chris <puevf@tbbqfubj.arg.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> >> Suburbanaristic <Musselman@wohoo.com> wrote:
> >> > In article <oc1ce394186k4usmgiilbp5l8ieafgr4no@4ax.com>,
> >> > Alan Smithee <AlanSmithee@nospam.nul> wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> After over six years, Osama is still free, we are in an Eternal War we
> >> >> started in Iraq, and we are no more safer than that idiot Bush made us
> >> >> on 9-10.  Heckuva job, Bushit.
> >> > 
> >> > Aren'y you playing into Bush's scheme when you claim we're no safer?
> >> 
> >> I know you're playing with a short-circuited intellect, but one can
> >> agree that we're no safer without agreeing *why*.
> > 
> > The argument is vacuous,no matter who uses it. "Safer" suggests more 
> > safe. More safe, less safe -  than what?
> 
> Than we were on 9/10/2001. It's stated above quite explicitly.
> 
> Any other questions?

Could you quantify just how we're safer, or less safe?