🚀 go-pugleaf

Al wrote:
> In article <13dc5uqbe6rq424@corp.supernews.com>,
>  Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:
> 
>> Al wrote:
>>> In article <fbn9d35us2di4aohsgp96emj15d72btqt6@4ax.com>,
>>>  felton <felton@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:11:29 -0500, Al <albert.finney000@geemail.coom>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <1fd9d3hlp7e3l2jrunvhvlosgmbhihlquv@4ax.com>,
>>>>> felton <felton@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:39:07 -0500, Suburbanaristic
>>>>>> <Musselman@wohoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <19g8d3d9f1baegmq846t5st2j1nlilhlv7@4ax.com>,
>>>>>>> felton <felton@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 02:10:15 -0500, Alan Smithee
>>>>>>>> <AlanSmithee@nospam.nul> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww
>>>>>>>> You know it is quite an accomplishment to stand out for being dumb as
>>>>>>>> a box of rocks in the beauty queen circuit.  Just once I would like to
>>>>>>>> see some sort of Jeopardy-like questions or spelling bee or some damn
>>>>>>>> thing if they are going to have these stupid contests.  The ultimate
>>>>>>>> irony?  The winner gets some money for college:)  Too late.
>>>>>>> You'd do her in a heartbeat.
>>>>>> As far as I know they don't have a contest for that.  If there was,
>>>>>> she wouldn't do well at all.  Complete opposite of my type.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> She does sort of remind me of someone I used to "know".  Very good
>>>>>> looking.  Painfully dumb.  Boredom sets in mighty quick.  
>>>>> Yeah, but its fun getting there.
>>>> True.  I never said I regretted "knowing" her.  And, in fairness,
>>>> standards are very much a function of age and options:)  
>>> Well, what would we have done back in the day were it not for the 
>>> less-than-intellectually-gifted women who strayed into the rutting 
>>> fields occasionally? Everyone has a purpose. Some women are around just 
>>> to keep the peace (someone call the Mullahs - lighten up dudes!)
>>
>> "less-than-intellectually-gifted"?  "strayed into the rutting fields 
>> occasionally"?  That's BS.  Those gals were bored with the guy they were 
>> boppin the day before, and there you were dancing a jig in *their* 
>> rutting field, wound you up like a cheap clock.
> 
> You seem an eager biographer, which causes you to miss the point. After 
> all, you could comment on the gist of the post, but you choose to invent 
> a fiction and go with it.

I neither missed nor invented a damn thing and you know it.

> 
> I see you been doin' some cipherin'!

Here's one thing you don't know, but I've been doin a lot more than that.

>  
>> quality of their catch, but they knew exactly what they were doing and 
>> had you right where you wanted them.
> 
> Convoluted sentence of the week award.

Make s pefrect sence tome.


-- 
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'