🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 20:46:51 -0500, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:

>Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:26:43 -0500, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:
>> 
>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:50:29 -0500, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:34:50 -0500, Jer <gdunn@airmail.ten> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if the walrus also drove a Hummer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2007-08-26-walrus-fossil_N.htm?
>>>>>> Penis, "bone"?  isn't that cheating, or does it just mean the walrus
>>>>>> had an implant due to impotency?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And 4 feet?  I can't imagine that the female walrus could accommodate
>>>>>> a 4 foot pecker.  Maybe this is why they went extinct.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ron
>>>>> I imagine the female walrus could easily accommodate more, thereby 
>>>>> reproducing more of it's own genetic pool.  Remember, this is a fossil 
>>>>> of dead genetic material which, in all likelihood, didn't contribute 
>>>>> much after it's demise.
>>>> True.  I just don't picture the female walrus having a 4 foot play pen
>>>
>>> Sometimes it is difficult to wrap a brain cell around the truth because 
>>> it's not always packaged in a familiar box.
>> 
>> Maybe it is too early in the morning for me, I feel like I need that
>> one translated
>
>
>There are some people that have to have the truth packaged in a neat 
>tidy box with a bow on top because that's the only way they'd recognize 
>it for what it is.  I submit, sometimes the truth comes packaged 
>differently, and if we're not willing to accept this difference, we'll 
>miss an opportunity to learn.
>
>better?

Yea, that worked