🚀 go-pugleaf

On Jan 2, 4:00 am, John Griffin <thathillbi...@yahooie.com> wrote:
> A slower life form posting as d...@network125.com gushed:
>

Slower life form?  And pray tell what gives you the arrogance to view
others as slower life forms
>
> > His name is Obama.  America even chose him over the Republican
> > for President.
>
> Obama groupies picked the man the way they choose their favorite
> songs, etc.

Obama groupies?  Boy, are you pathetic.  I chose Obama for his
intelligence, leadership qualities and incredible talent.


> MTV plays it over and over and manipulates you into
> buying it. You love that sound, can't get it out of your
> head...and in your case can't get much else in.  Sadly, with
> Obama, sound is all there is.  He's sort of like a "rock star" on
> "air guitar."  The rush to support Obama was like a stampede,
> i.e., a reflex action as opposed to a decision.  (In your case,
> that's a duuuhhhh.)
>

No, the support for Obama was seeing the man and seeing him operate
and handle himself for two years running for President.

Are you saying that there are 69,456,897 groupies in the United States
because that is how many votes Obama got, more votes than ANY other
Presidential candidate in history.

Obama carried 28 states, in every region of the country including the
south, as well as the Distict of Columbia and one Nebraska
congressional district.

And if it weren't for the vicious and racist attacks on his, his vote
total would have been greater.



> >     When you get out of grief, mourning, and
> > denial, school thyself on it.
>
> Meathead, you jump to the typical knee-jerk conclusion--again and
> again.  "Grief, mourning..."!? Holy shit...apologies to meatheads
> for thinking you're up there with them on the intellect scale.
>

Meatheads?  Oh, now I know:  you are chanelling Archie Bunker.

> By the way, doofus, the republican wasn't the only other
> candidate.  Get your mom to explain that to you. Your done-
> nothing hero was also chosen over a dozen or so other "official"
> candidates in various states, and sadly, over my write-in
> candidate.
>

What the hell are you saying here?

> > Yeah folks, Republican dildos like Griffuck are this stupid
> > and out of touch with America and Americans.  Pathetic losers,
> > literally.
>
> "Yeah, folks,..." the mental dwarf lectures, as though he thinks
> his parrot act commands an audience... bwaahahaha!
>

Totally moronic statement.  Best you can do?


>
> Paraphrasing you and a horde of other dimwits: "If you see the
> problems with grandiloquent but otherwise unremarkable mediocre
> senator Obama, i.e., if you considered his lack of qualifications
> rather than instantly and mindlessly becoming enthralled by his
> speechifying, you're a pathetic loser."

No, the pathetic losers here are John McCain, Sarah Palin and you and
the right-wing attack machine

We are the winners, Obama and everyone who supported him.  It was in
all the papers and on CNN, even FOX


\
>
> Millions of people are going to be surprised by the greenhorn.  I
> hope the congress and his controllers will do everything possible
> to assure that he does a passable job in his four years. That
> success is going to be at least mildly surprising to most of
> those who see him as what he is--just some guy who has dedicated
> every moment of the past decade or so to polishing his oratorical
> skills. Obama isn't some kind of superstatesman or quasi deity.  
> He's just an embodiment of oration.  It will surprise the shit
> right out of your head when that fact inevitably becomes clear to
> millions of fools almost like you and almost clear to dullards
> exactly like you.

Wonderful name calling but you made no substantial point

Meanwhile, Obama goes in with the highest approval ratings of any
President-elect and all the attacks from insignificant bitter people
like you are only going to make his approval and support higher

So please keep it up

.  
>
> Please don't stop posting when you notice that you have nothing
> to say except "I love the rhetorician and I squeal every time
> someone says he doesn't share my adoration for him."  You're
> funny.  Now, squeal for me again.
>

Nothing to squeal about.

> --
> "From each according to his ability, to each according to his
> need."  --Karl Marx, on "the ideal state of communism"
> "You may have to give up a piece of your pie so that someone
>  else can have more."
>   --Obama, explicitly endorsing "the ideal state of communism"

Communism?  Give me a break.

Obama has made millions in this capitalistic society.  His wife became
a hospital administration earning over three hundred thousand dollars
a year (besides being really good looking) and he has made a fortune
on his books.

Meanwhile, your precious georgiegirl gave socialistic support to
people like Haliburton and KBR (no bid contracts, where's the
capitalism in that please tell me)