🚀 go-pugleaf

On Dec 20, 9:00 pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 4:55 pm, bushlyed really made me laugh <LOL>:
>                     ...
>
> > On Dec 20, 12:40 pm, Clay <clays0nl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 1) I see you didn't (wouldn't or couldn't) answer the first question.
> > > Lemme pose it again:
>
> > > Where is the game that throws something (whatever that might be) at
> > > Muslim savages... you know, the folks who did a lot of the killing in
> > > Iraq?
>
> > I was trying to ignore the ignorant racism but OK.  Muslim savages.
>
> HAHAHAHAHA... you were simply (as a simpleton) trying to ignore your
> own ignorance.  The fact is the number of folks (who I refer to as
> "Muslim savages) who killed everyday, innocent Iraqis -- far
> outnumbers the innocent Iraqis killed by any of "the coalition".
>

How about our heroic blackwater guards who gunned downed innocent
civilians

How about our massive indiscriminate bombing that killed thousands of
innocent people

How about the simple fact that our invasion of Iraq was illegal,
immoral and unethical

I do not defend the suicide bombings like you seemingly defend our
massive killing of civilians because it is our devine right as
Americans but let's be clear:   none of this would be happening if it
weren't for our invasion

And the "Muslim savages" did not create millions of refugees

> You know that this is true... but your pathology -- self-hatred
> prevented you from confronting this reality.
>

Self-hatred?  No, I dislike bigots like you

> It was funny to get you to at least touch it.  You must make shrinks a
> lot of money.
>

What an idiotic statement.

> <LOL>
>
> > Yes, there are Muslims that are savages but if you would be
> > intelligent (which is obviously difficult for you), you will find that
> > we have been much more savage than Muslims could ever be.
>
> Keep it in Iraq... which is what we were discussing... then answer.
>

OK, keep it in Iraq

Again, we had no right under any international law to invade this
country

We killed tens of thousands of innocent civilians and we created the
atmosphere in which the people you refer to as "Muslim savages" could
thrive; none of this happened before the invasion

> > Remember what we did to the Indians?  Ask yourself who the only people
> > to use atomic weapons on civilians.  Remember the Crusades?
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHA... kinda hard for you to focus on one subject at a time,
> huh?  I guess all of the voices that are screaming in that pinhead of
> yours must be very loud... as Christmas approaches.
>

We are focusing on ONE subject, that of savagery

> I truly pity you.... as I laugh my ass off at you.
>

Sure, pity someone with at least thirty IQ points on you

> > And we killed tens of thousands of people in Iraq all for Bush's
> > vanity so who is really the savages?
>
> HEHEHEHEHEHE... how many folks did Iran kill, shit-for-brains?
>

Let's see Mr. name caller, you said focus on one subject, Iraq, then
you mention Iran; the sheer stupidity of your not being able to keep
it on one subject is incredible

> Do you know?
>
> <LOL>
>
> > > 2) I see you didn't (wouldn't or couldn't) answer the second
> > > question.  Lemme pose it again:
>
> > > Will it be OK, when he (Obama) does (fucks something up), for someone
> > > to create a game based on that fuck-up, post it online w/o you
> > > becoming upset?
>
> > No.  
>
> A truly weak mind... at work* (such as that is).
>


I will be glad to challenge you to an IQ test, five thousand dollars
to the winner

We can get my bank and your bank to arrange it

> <LOL>
>
> > I would merely laugh at their stupidity as I am laughing at
> > yours.
> OIC... you wrote:
>
> "Obama deserves respect; Bush doesn't"
>
> But you're too stupid to understand your own stupidity.
>
> You were lots of fun to fuck with, dimbulb.
>

Yes, when you begin this absurd name calling, then you know you are
out of intellectual arguments