Article View: dfw.singles
Article #94Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL
From: J. Buckley
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 00:00
37 lines
3378 bytes
3378 bytes
Adventurer wrote: > > > Thanks for responding to my post, but I'm *not* short; I'm 6'2". I > > was just responding to comments like "shouldn't we judge people by > > what's on the inside" by asking if the people saying that practice what > > they preach. If they want to dance, do they ask the closest person to > > dance, or do they go for an attractive person? When at a party, do they > > always start conversations with the attractive people, or just anyone > > who's having a good time? > > I agree that height does not make the man. Although I prefer men who are > taller than myself (I'm 5'7"), it's really who he is and not how far he is > from his toes. And if a shorter man is confident and comfortable with > himself, without being egotistical, then he will portray that to women. He > may have to work a little harder to be seen, though. > > Heidi Please, Heidi, what do you mean, "it's really"? It's really what? Your preference shouts where you whisper, I'm afraid. Let me be so bold as to tell you what I think you mean, or, at least, what I hear and what I've experienced. You've seen some "short" guy, who maybe is even (as Dona said) cute, and you think to yourself "Hum... he'd be a great catch. For someone else..." Aaarrrggg!!!! I can't tell you how many times I've been told by an attractive (or even not so attractive) lady "I really should introduce you to my (choose one: sister, friend, neighbor, roommate...) It never seems to happen, though. Sorry. Frustration showing through, again. Joe
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32DD7F0A.2BB@erols.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <5b1edf$dlm3@sooner.brightok.net> <32D49337.5066@garlic.com> <01bc01b2$e48291e0$cd315bcc@test> <32DCC451.22E1@garlic.com> <01bc02ee$5db2c440$4d741dce@timd>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4c9a,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4c9a,public X-Google-Thread: f9306,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9306,public X-Google-Thread: 10a5b2,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a5b2,public X-Google-Thread: f43e0,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e0,public X-Google-Thread: 1095c1,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gid1095c1,public X-Google-Thread: 10f731,5baab29f1c13eb92 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f731,public X-Google-Thread: f4f15,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4f15,public X-Google-Thread: f8a21,9ee8a7b193df5629 X-Google-Attributes: gidf8a21,public From: "J. Buckley" <jbuckley@erols.com> Subject: Re: BEING SHORT vs *too* TALL Date: 1997/01/15 Message-ID: <32DD7F0A.2BB@erols.com> X-Deja-AN: 210085750 references: <31160E70.3346@postoffice.ptd.net> <32935CAA.1891@Neversoft.com> <329A3AF4.176A@Neversoft.com> <57od8p$8k4$1@info1.fnal.gov> <58b7qu$lql@clotho.c2.org> <32B89AA3.5040@webspan.net> <Pine.SUN.3.94.961220094107.19685A-100000@access2.digex.net> <MPG.d2b6e4d8cfc803698974a@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <01bbf481$cd6f42c0$3ff042ce@etherman.mdc.net> <32CA5086.255B@fastlane.net> <5b1edf$dlm3@sooner.brightok.net> <32D49337.5066@garlic.com> <01bc01b2$e48291e0$cd315bcc@test> <32DCC451.22E1@garlic.com> <01bc02ee$5db2c440$4d741dce@timd> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: You're kidding, right? mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: jbuckley@erols.com newsgroups: dfw.singles,dfw.personals,de.talk.romance,dc.romance,houston.singles,houston.personals,fj.soc.men-women,alt.romance,alt.romance.chat,alt.romance.mature-adult,alt.romance.online,alt.personals,ba.singles,alt.romance.unhappy,alt.soulmates,ba.personals,chi.pe x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; U)