Article View: dk.edb.hardware.overclocking
Article #201M I-5'Pe rsecution b ugging and counter-surveillanc e
From: vfvem
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:07
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:07
45 lines
3511 bytes
3511 bytes
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= MI5:. bugging and counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ?. If not, why not ? I mean if PO: >I thought that was happening to me, I'd search the place from top to. bottom, PO: >I mean I live there I would know if anything was out of. place. If I was PO: >really suspicious, I would call. in one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have those machines that pick up the transmitted radio. waves. This PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme on BBC1. on That's exactly what we did. We went. to a competent, professional detective agency in London, paid them. over 400 quid to debug our house. They used scanner devices which go to over. 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby transmitter in that range, they also. checked the phones and found nothing... but if the tap was at. the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything, would. they? CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in. fact, no bugs to be found? You can assume that they've done this sort of thing to other. people in more "serious" cases, where they would know the targets would. suspect the presence of electronic surveillance. So they will. have developed techniques and devices which are not readily detectable either by visual. inspection or by electronic means. What those techniques. might be, I couldn't guess. In this case, the existence of. bugging devices was clear from the beginning, and. they "rubbed it in" with what was said by the boy on the coach.. It was almost as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be called in, who they knew would. fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility to the other things I would have to. say relating to the harassment. I did all the things someone in my situation would do to try to find. the bugs. In addition to calling in professional help. using electronic counter-surveillance, I. made a close visual inspection of electrical equipment, plus any points where. audio or video surveillance devices might have been. concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are. quite noticeable and require visible supporting circuitry. It seems to me. the best place to put a small video surveillance device would be additional. to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV or video. It would be necessary to physically. break in to a property to fit such. a device. 4116
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<vg0800010907347140@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.alt.netShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d2c,61b890249ab74eb6,start X-Google-Thread: 107408,61b890249ab74eb6,start X-Google-Thread: ffcb5,61b890249ab74eb6,start X-Google-Thread: 105f3d,61b890249ab74eb6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid112d2c,gid107408,gidffcb5,gid105f3d,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out03a.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in01.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!news.alt.net From: vfvem@bigfoot.com Newsgroups: dk.edb.hardware.overclocking,dk.erhverv.direkte-salg,dnepr.commerce.computers,dnepr.commerce.energy,dnepr.commerce.orgtech Subject: M I-5'Pe rsecution b ugging and counter-surveillanc e Followup-To: dk.edb.hardware.overclocking,dk.erhverv.direkte-salg,dnepr.commerce.computers,dnepr.commerce.energy,dnepr.commerce.orgtech,uk.misc Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 09:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com Lines: 46 Message-ID: <vg0800010907347140@4ax.com>