Re: Socket Keep-awake Option?

Article View: dnet.ham

Article #211

#211

From: Jay Maynard
Date: Sun, 19 May 1991 03:43

10 lines
817 bytes

> Keep-alives are the work of the devil.

Aw, cmon, Russ...tell us what you _really_ think. :-)

> If it's only temporary, why give up on it?

That depends on your idea of temporary. In the Internet world, temporary
is a few minutes. In the ham packet world, temporary is a few days.

...Jay, K5ZC

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9105190241.AA16679@ucsd.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 12f11c,4baad5f5ca8690ec
X-Google-Attributes: gid12f11c,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-19 03:36:52 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway
From: S0JM@ADMIN.HSC.UTH.TMC.EDU (Jay Maynard)
Newsgroups: dnet.ham
Subject: Re: Socket Keep-awake Option?
Message-ID: <9105190241.AA16679@ucsd.edu>
Date: 19 May 91 03:43:11 GMT
Sender: daemon@infoac.rmi.de
Organization: RMI Net INFO.box Systems * Aachen * Hamburg * Flensburg
Lines: 10