Article View: dnet.ham
Article #215Socket Keep-awake Option?
From: Gareth Howell
Date: Sun, 19 May 1991 04:44
Date: Sun, 19 May 1991 04:44
20 lines
1385 bytes
1385 bytes
Hi all, Has anybody modified NOS to support this option on its sockets? It sure would be useful sometimes. As you all know, we have problems interacting with MSYS boxes, the ability to probe the remote node to see if it is still there would prevent a build up of sockets in FIN WAIT 2 as we get at present. I know some tcp implementations have this, perhaps we could as well. It would only need to probe about 1 per hour, just to detect that the other end has either reset or died and come back up again. Another time it would be useful is where SMTP sessions get stuck because the other end has died. Let's face it, in an amateur environment, end nodes do dissappear temporarily occasionally; the ability to detect this, reset the session, and restart the mail transfer at the next smtp timer tick would increase overall system availability. Gareth
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<memo.36812@cix.compulink.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 12f11c,4baad5f5ca8690ec X-Google-Attributes: gid12f11c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-05-19 03:55:50 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway From: garethh@cix.COMpulink.co.UK (Gareth Howell) Newsgroups: dnet.ham Subject: Socket Keep-awake Option? Message-ID: <memo.36812@cix.compulink.co.uk> Date: 19 May 91 04:44:07 GMT Sender: daemon@infoac.rmi.de Organization: RMI Net INFO.box Systems * Aachen * Hamburg * Flensburg Lines: 20