Article View: dnet.ham
Article #90Info-Hams Digest V91 #271
From: INFOAC-Operator
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1991 12:37
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1991 12:37
109 lines
6758 bytes
6758 bytes
>Path: infoac!unido!fauern!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!caen!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!ucsd!news-mail-gateway
>From: LJACK@umab.umd.edu (Larry Jack)
>Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc
>Subject: Info-Hams Digest V91 #271
>Message-ID: <9104051855.AA10738@ucsd.edu>
>Date: 5 Apr 91 17:54:51 GMT
>References: <info-hams-relay@UCSD.EDU>
>Sender: daemon@ucsd.Edu
>Organization: UCSD Usenet Gateway
>Lines: 92
From: Larry Jack KL7GLK / V77LJ
RG8U and other colourful callsigns
Once upon a time a call like RG8U would have stuck out like the famous
sore thumb. Now I'm not so sure that it would raise much more than a few
eyebrows.
In the Good Old Days (Oh no, not another OF off in Oldtimers heaven)
you could pretty well tell where someone was by his callsign. I would
place the point of transition around the early '70's with the advent of
the U.S.'s "Funny Calls." Don't get me wrong, I've have nothing against
them, and for those that don't know what I am referring to they are the
new 2X1, 2X2 calls that were openned up when the FCC began to deregulate
life. With me they are fine, they are even fun. Try giving the call
KU2Q quickly in a pileup,..see? Or how about a QSL with W1MP? But
what ham hasn't played head games with callsign alphabet soup? Certainly
we all want that certain individuality that sets us apart from the crowd.
And as Hams nothing more than our callsigns will ever come close. What
I'm trying to lead up to a point, which is, as we all strive to become more
unique that the next chap, we all seem to loose anything that is special.
Again, don't get me wrong, the new callsigns are fun, easy(?), colourful &
here to stay. But think a moment, you Old Farts, to the time when a pre-
fix like KB6 could only have been something, something ***VERY RARE!!***
I found myself thinking this during lastweek's WPX contest,after working a
6I8 station,only to look up the international allocation (who keeps those
rare things like 6I's in their heads?) to find it was Mexico. Sure sounded
alot rarer than Mexico! Remember when they all were XE's? Of course this
does have the effect of making practically anyone at least sound like rare
no matter where they are. I guess that being "rare" will just have to
be measured by things other than callsigns. Having been on both side of the
issue (the hunter as well as the hunted--) .......I will pause briefly
in silent reflection at this passing....and move on.
Which brings me to what I had set out originally to do,to tell all you new
hams a little about the exciting origins and previous owners of what
you may today consider everyday callsigns.
There was a time when KC4
would cause world class pileups....
Back in the pre 1970's and to some extent even today a US callsign from
the following areas were rare birds. Many as you can see, have been
lumped under generic categories like KH# and other deleted completely
as their status (relative to the US) changed, ie: KA#. Think your call
is just one in a thousand? Take pride amigo, at look at its rich history!
KA6- These were private stations of Americans in Occupied Japan post WW2.
Unlike state-side callsigns, these were assigned by the military
commands and not the FCC. Seems I remember KA1's thru 0's with
the KA8's being assigned to military club station, all the others
were home stations. The Japanese authorities forbid JA's from talking
to any KA's. To talk to a Japanese station you had to have a JA license.
That's another story.
KB6 A rare one- The Bonnin (Spelling?) and Volcano Islands of the far pacific
KC's Both 4's and 6's existed,and like KB6's were outside the authority of the
FCC. Antarctica and the Canton Islands respectfully. KC4USA etc. were
the research stations that would be heard through the frequent solar
flares. KC4 is still used there.
KG's Both 4's and 6's were used. The 4's are still heard from that sore
Castro would like to forget, in Cuba. 6's were (still) Guam
KH6 Hawaii - The KH's (1, 2 etc.) replaced many of the following:
KJ6 Johnson Island. A real treat to work. Not much to visit (those
of us who have wish they could have at least kept this as something
unique...goodness knows they've little else out there) Again, assigned
by the military
KL7 Alaska, still is though no more are assigned- NL7, WL7's today
but it could change
KM6 Midway Island, Pacific
KN6 Old Novice class licenses from California
KP6 Palmyra and Jarvis Islands, Pacific. Rare then, Rare today. KH5
replaced KP6
KR6 Okinawa, same as the KA's above.
KS Both 4's and 6's. The 6's were Saipan, the 4's Swan Island.
Swan was a CIA base on the coast of Central America. Working a
real KS4 was to work a spy.
KT's Fortunately their never were any, but once there was a move afoot
to have this as the prefix for Technican class licenses. Similar
to the KN's and WN's
KV4 Still the Virgin Islands
KW6 Wake Island, Pacific
KX6 The Marshall Islands, now V7's. KX6BU Kwajalein was famous worldwide.
KZ5 The Canal Zone in Panama.
Part 5 Experimental Radio Service Licenses used amateur radio callsigns
except they would include an X in the suffix. For example KI2XNA-
the X as the first letter always meant an experimental station. Since they
were licensed for all kinds of things outside the ham bands, many hams
tuning across these weird calls were easily upset. All legal though. The
prefix could be anything, and the district (#) didn't reflect the Ham
call districts.
Still think a KC6 is nothing.....?
Larry Jack KL7GLK (ex KX6LJ, KR6LJ
KI2XNA etc.)
--
*****************************************************************
___ ____ ___ _ _ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ _ _
/__/ / / / / /\ / /__ / /__//__// /__//__ /\ /
/ \ / / __/_ / / /__ / / // //__ / //__ / /
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9104061220.AA06286@infoac.rmi.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gatewayShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 12f11c,df52fc9a3be7187b,start X-Google-Attributes: gid12f11c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1991-04-06 05:45:10 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!infoac!news-mail-gateway From: root@infoac (INFOAC-Operator) Newsgroups: dnet.ham Subject: Info-Hams Digest V91 #271 Message-ID: <9104061220.AA06286@infoac.rmi.de> Date: 6 Apr 91 12:37:04 GMT Sender: daemon@infoac.rmi.de Organization: RMI Net INFO.box Systems * Aachen * Hamburg * Flensburg Lines: 109