Article View: eduni.general
Article #402Re: Z Campaign: Where to complain
From: R.J.Hare
Date: Fri, 28 May 1993 16:57
Date: Fri, 28 May 1993 16:57
9 lines
999 bytes
999 bytes
diana@aisb.ed.ac.uk (Diana Bental) writes: > Given the amount of publicity created by such a small expenditure, EDC > cannot be faulted on grounds of cost-effectiveness. I see - it's OK to generate publicity which is offensive to (approx) 50% of the population as long as it's cost effective? RH.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36513@castle.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!festival!rjhareReferences:
<1993May14.110315.21033@aisb.ed.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10dcde,7a0150df6b5c56c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10dcde,public X-Google-Thread: 10e553,7a0150df6b5c56c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e553,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-05-28 10:35:04 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!festival!rjhare From: rjhare@festival.ed.ac.uk (R.J.Hare) Newsgroups: eduni.general,alt.fan.ken-johnson Subject: Re: Z Campaign: Where to complain Message-ID: <36513@castle.ed.ac.uk> Date: 28 May 93 16:57:52 GMT References: <1993May14.110315.21033@aisb.ed.ac.uk> Sender: nntpusr@castle.ed.ac.uk Lines: 9