Article View: es.comp.lenguajes.c++
Article #85switch vs if else if
From: mierdeneitor
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:49
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:49
9 lines
1528 bytes
1528 bytes
El caso es que el switch es mas optimizado que el if else if, si hacemos una optimización del codigo if a nivel de ensamblador llegariamos el switch he tratado de dar una introduccion a ese caso en mi blog, espero que te funcione http://infogalacticom.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/if-else-if-vs-switch/ saludos
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ebb658b1-061f-4cc2-96b5-e7ae61e23b85@z20g2000prh.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z20g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: d2efa0cfdc,ee51f101a4ae5e05,start X-Google-Attributes: gidd2efa0cfdc,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: SPANISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z20g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: mierdeneitor <mierdeneitor@gmail.com> Newsgroups: es.comp.lenguajes.c++ Subject: switch vs if else if Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 9 Message-ID: <ebb658b1-061f-4cc2-96b5-e7ae61e23b85@z20g2000prh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.54.190.49 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244897388 8675 127.0.0.1 (13 Jun 2009 12:49:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: z20g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.54.190.49; posting-account=sSbxuwoAAACJC0PqUx8sELXT9Gpdrjy6 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-ES; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)