Re: gtk+ vs qt

Article View: es.comp.os.linux.programacion

Article #10556

Back to es.comp.os.linux.programacion Previous Next

#10556

From: NotFound
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 02:18

10 lines
1142 bytes

> > > 2. Preferencia por un consumo minimo de recursos.
> >
> > Ninguna de ellas ;)
> 
> Se admiten más opciones si sabes de otra que consuma menos.

La Xlib a pelo.

Salu2

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3C75AA67.BD9B25BF@hobbiton.org>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.ebone.net!news1.ebone.net!cesio.mundo-r.com!not-for-mail

References:

<20020221184806.1331e4f2.pepehd@hotmail.com> <3C753418.43A2A8CC@hobbiton.org> <20020222132414.6f1e74a0.pepehd@hotmail.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: SPANISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: f86c8,e62eed949ada154b
X-Google-Attributes: gidf86c8,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-22 11:21:10 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.ebone.net!news1.ebone.net!cesio.mundo-r.com!not-for-mail
From: NotFound <blassic@hobbiton.org>
Newsgroups: es.comp.os.linux.programacion
Subject: Re: gtk+ vs qt
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 03:18:15 +0100
Organization: Another Netscape Collabra Server User
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <3C75AA67.BD9B25BF@hobbiton.org>
References: <20020221184806.1331e4f2.pepehd@hotmail.com>
  <3C753418.43A2A8CC@hobbiton.org> <20020222132414.6f1e74a0.pepehd@hotmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cm64110.red.mundo-r.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en

Reply to Parent Message