Re: gnu manifesto

Article View: eunet.followup

Article #554

#554

From: Johnny Eriksson
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1989 10:15

11 lines
1237 bytes

In article <71@euteal.ele.tue.nl> mart@ele.tue.nl (Mart van Stiphout) writes:
>In article <8261@boring.cwi.nl> reinier@cwi.nl (R v/d Born) writes:
>>He probably didn't dare to send it across the ocean.
>>
>In fact I tried to post it to a moderated gnu newsgroup first but
>it bounced. I then decided to try it out in Europe first to
>see if the manifest required improvements. Unfortunately few
>gnu adept have good arguments against my manifest.

The best way to respond to your manifest, I think, is to ignore it.
And that's what most people have done...

Technical Details

Message-ID: <98@sunic.sunet.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!kth!sunic!bygg

References: <66@euteal.ele.tue.nl> <4819@freja.diku.dk> <8261@boring.cwi.nl> <71@euteal.ele.tue.nl>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 164d81,5c7b3fa90d56fb27
X-Google-Attributes: gid164d81,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1989-07-12 18:16:05 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!kth!sunic!bygg
From: bygg@sunic.sunet.se (Johnny Eriksson)
Newsgroups: eunet.followup
Subject: Re: gnu manifesto
Keywords: gnu
Message-ID: <98@sunic.sunet.se>
Date: 12 Jul 89 10:15:57 GMT
References: <66@euteal.ele.tue.nl> <4819@freja.diku.dk> <8261@boring.cwi.nl> <71@euteal.ele.tue.nl>
Reply-To: bygg@sunic.sunet.se (Johnny Eriksson)
Distribution: eunet
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 11
Posted: Wed Jul 12 11:15:57 1989

Reply to Parent Message