Article View: eunet.followup
Article #559Re: gnu manifesto
From: Lars-Henrik Eriksson
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1989 06:42
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1989 06:42
43 lines
3028 bytes
3028 bytes
In article <72@euteal.ele.tue.nl>, mart@ele (Mart van Stiphout) writes: >... Fact is that >a lot of the software delivered by computer vendors is so good >that there is no need for me to rewrite it. ... It is closer to the truth to say that you CANNOT rewrite it, it most cases you won't get sources without paying rediculous amounts of mony. During several years I was responsible for the administration and operation of a large timesharing system with several hundred users. (Made by a very well known vendor with a reputation, especially in the computer science community - at least at the time - for making high-quality hardware and software). The bugs were innumerable. Often the bugs compromised system security or were great obstacles to the users of certain programs. Since we didn't have sources we hade to wait for the company to answer our bug reports (which could take half a year, or so) or debug and patch the binaries. We often had to resort to the last alternative, unless our friendly field service rep. gave us the sources illegaly (which he quite often did, when we needed them). From my experience as a user of different systems I have no reason to believe that other vendors in general have better quality software. >instance, no need for the gnu bourne shell remake, the diff remake, etc. >If they are better, why doesn't Stallman sell it: It is Stallmans express opinion that selling intellectual achievements is immoral, haven't you read the real GNU manifesto? (I must say that I sympathize strongly with him on this point) >advantage 1: he gets more money for more people to make more remakes. >advantage 2: every computer buyer and unix user who don't want to port >the gnu stuff get better tools. But you see, right now they can get better tools for free! As for the question of support, it is Stallmans intention that support of GNU could be offered by independent companies, just as many companies offer hardware support for other manufacturers equipment. Sound completely reasonable to me. -- Lars-Henrik Eriksson Internet: lhe@sics.se Swedish Institute of Computer Science Phone (intn'l): +46 8 752 15 09 Box 1263 Telefon (nat'l): 08 - 752 15 09 S-164 28 KISTA, SWEDEN
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1989Jul13.064156.8613@ceridwen.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!kth!sunic!sics.se!newsReferences:
<66@euteal.ele.tue.nl> <959@sering.cwi.nl> <72@euteal.ele.tue.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 164d81,5c7b3fa90d56fb27 X-Google-Attributes: gid164d81,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1989-07-13 15:46:57 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!kth!sunic!sics.se!news From: lhe@sics.se (Lars-Henrik Eriksson) Newsgroups: eunet.followup Subject: Re: gnu manifesto Message-ID: <1989Jul13.064156.8613@ceridwen.uucp> Date: 13 Jul 89 06:42:05 GMT References: <66@euteal.ele.tue.nl> <959@sering.cwi.nl> <72@euteal.ele.tue.nl> Sender: lhe@ceridwen.uucp (Lars-Henrik Eriksson) Reply-To: lhe@sics.se (Lars-Henrik Eriksson) Distribution: eunet Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Stockholm (Kista), Sweden Lines: 44 Posted: Thu Jul 13 07:42:05 1989 In-reply-to: mart@ele.tue.nl (Mart van Stiphout)