Article View: eunet.followup
Article #643Re: slow mail?
From: Piet Beertema
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1989 21:32
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 1989 21:32
20 lines
1453 bytes
1453 bytes
Let us all hope that a forthcoming new mcvax hardware isn't just outdated by the growing load when it arrives. Fortunately new hardware isn't the only change: EUnet as a whole is improving its infrastructure (more leased lines, faster lines) providing better connectivity between the backbones and to the USA; in the improved setup part of the traffic will bypass [the new] mcvax altogether, thus ensuring better service anyway, even though the traffic may increase. The splitoff of the function of Dutch backbone site off mcvax (taken over by hp4nl) has already done a lot of good: in about half a year the total traffic through mcvax and hp4nl together has increased from about 2.4 Gigabyte per month to 3.3 Gigabyte per month; mcvax alone simply wouldn't have been able to carry that much traffic. -- Opinions expressed above reflect those of my employer, except when they don't. Piet Beertema, CWI, Amsterdam (piet@cwi.nl)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<854@sering.cwi.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!pietReferences:
<849@sering.cwi.nl> <1010@gmdzi.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 164d81,67e2e2b778153584 X-Google-Attributes: gid164d81,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1989-03-29 21:47:07 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!piet From: piet@cwi.nl (Piet Beertema) Newsgroups: eunet.followup Subject: Re: slow mail? Message-ID: <854@sering.cwi.nl> Date: 29 Mar 89 21:32:48 GMT References: <849@sering.cwi.nl> <1010@gmdzi.UUCP> Distribution: eunet Organization: CWI, Amsterdam Lines: 20 Posted: Wed Mar 29 22:32:48 1989