Re: ANSI C draft

Article View: eunet.followup

Article #654

#654

From: Andrew Josey
Date: Fri, 05 May 1989 07:13

8 lines
1081 bytes

In article <4449@cheviot.newcastle.ac.uk>, Lindsay.Marshall@newcastle.ac.uk (Lindsay F. Marshall) writes:
> >The C programming language, second edition
> DO NOT buy this as a reference for ANSI C at the moment!!!!!
> There are errors in this as they guessed wrong about the standard. 

I think you'll find K&R predicted X3J11 correctly.  The only change to the
standard since publication has been that the noalias type qualifier drifted 
in and drifted out again.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1099@uel.co.uk>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!ukc!axion!ist!uel!andrew

References: <1989Apr15.163754.7354@isy.liu.se> <2615@netmbx.UUCP> <4449@cheviot.newcastle.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 164d81,b66969284be7bd11,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid164d81,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1989-05-04 14:55:18 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmdzi!unido!mcvax!ukc!axion!ist!uel!andrew
From: andrew@uel.co.uk (Andrew Josey)
Newsgroups: eunet.followup
Subject: Re: ANSI C draft
Summary: K&R Issue 2
Message-ID: <1099@uel.co.uk>
Date: 5 May 89 07:13:04 GMT
References: <1989Apr15.163754.7354@isy.liu.se> <2615@netmbx.UUCP> <4449@cheviot.newcastle.ac.uk>
Distribution: eunet
Organization: AT&T UNIX Software Operation
Lines: 10
Posted: Fri May  5 08:13:04 1989

Reply to Parent Message