Article View: eunet.misc
Article #182Re: new powers for employers to read employees' email
From: seajays
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:15
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:15
35 lines
2715 bytes
2715 bytes
In article <fbVJ5.7034$MK5.686900@news1.cableinet.net>, "Mike Read" <mread@cableinet.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > I read about half of it, and scanned the rest as it became clear > > that > > > > the arguments being put forward were weak. > > > > > > If you believe they are weak, can you explain why? My guess is that > > > you haven't understood them properly, because on my reading they > > > (at the very least) need a rebuttal, and you haven't offered one. > > Saying > > > they are weak doesn't make them so - you need to provide some sort > > > of argument. > > > > > > > Sorry to disappoint you Mike, but I just can't summon the energy - I > > just didn't find it made any points interesting enough to take the > > trouble to point out the flaws. > > Then you lose. > > ;-P > [chuckle] :-) (PS: You snipped my last paragraph though where I explained why it is pointless to argue the points as they are not the fundamental issue) :-P Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8t9apg$d23$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!208.184.7.66!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<kqgavso9d8ugqufmkcveqqj71t8je4sv6e@4ax.com> <8t3g8p$aj$2@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t3pjt$qte$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8t3qti$bp$1@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t4alc$98a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <CbpJ5.3584$MK5.360545@news1.cableinet.net> <8t6805$sbv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <u1BJ5.4475$MK5.452604@news1.cableinet.net> <8t6r0e$b9v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <fgLJ5.6196$MK5.614302@news1.cableinet.net> <8t8v8r$4dk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <fbVJ5.7034$MK5.686900@news1.cableinet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fea0e,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gidfea0e,public X-Google-Thread: 10b88a,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b88a,public X-Google-Thread: 10b574,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b574,public X-Google-Thread: f6783,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6783,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-10-26 06:30:06 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!europa.netcrusader.net!208.184.7.66!newsfeed.skycache.com!Cidera!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: seajays@my-deja.com Newsgroups: eunet.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.misc Subject: Re: new powers for employers to read employees' email Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:15:35 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Lines: 35 Message-ID: <8t9apg$d23$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <kqgavso9d8ugqufmkcveqqj71t8je4sv6e@4ax.com> <8t3g8p$aj$2@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t3pjt$qte$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8t3qti$bp$1@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t4alc$98a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <CbpJ5.3584$MK5.360545@news1.cableinet.net> <8t6805$sbv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <u1BJ5.4475$MK5.452604@news1.cableinet.net> <8t6r0e$b9v$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <fgLJ5.6196$MK5.614302@news1.cableinet.net> <8t8v8r$4dk$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <fbVJ5.7034$MK5.686900@news1.cableinet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.247.87.172 X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Oct 26 13:15:35 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) via <B>Avirt Gateway Server</B> v4.0 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x70.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 194.247.87.172 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDseajays