Article View: eunet.misc
Article #208Re: new powers for employers to read employees' email
From: seajays
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:24
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:24
46 lines
3975 bytes
3975 bytes
In article <39F9664A.8AF3067E@my-deja.com>, Angus McBastard <angusmcb@my-deja.com> wrote: > You can only take caveat emptor so far.. > Nobody is asking you to give up bugger-all except your assumed "right" > to rip off the consumer (You as a software behemoth, of course). > > Put it this way I for one have never done a commission job for anyone > anywhere, that didn't involve the source ending up in the hands of the > customer, anything else would be just outrageous. > > But strange when focus is shifted to software for general consumption, > (where in fact the average customer couldn't use the source (for that > read song!) anyway) that software companies are allowed to fraudulently > pass off software unfit for consumption and with no guarantees for > fitness of use whatsoever, then use the very unfitness of their products > to justify expensive *cough* "support" to workaround their own bad > designs and thereby rip-off the consumer even more. > > Proprietary software distorts the market to such an extent that entities > like M$ can exist to distort it even further using corporate power:- and > everybody, including you, friend are the loser. Free Software implies > only that you sell a complete, working product, and not a > semi-functional part of the whole > Please understand, I really *do* sympathise with you over the problems associated with bad software, and I would like to see the law strengthened in the related areas to prevent such 'rip-offs' occurring and giivng power back to consumers to insist that corrections are made when software is not fit for purpose. But I still must maintain that all that can be achieved, without removing fundamental rights of people not to have their work copied and used by others for their gain, if they so wish. If people want to provide the source code of their creations then that is fine - I have no problem with that, but if they don't then that is their right and you should not be able to take away that right - just don't use the software if you find the conditions unacceptable. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8tbs52$eqb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!xfer10.netnews.com!netnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<kqgavso9d8ugqufmkcveqqj71t8je4sv6e@4ax.com> <8t3g8p$aj$2@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t3pjt$qte$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8t3qti$bp$1@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t4alc$98a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <CbpJ5.3584$MK5.360545@news1.cableinet.net> <8t6805$sbv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <u1BJ5.4475$MK5.452604@news1.cableinet.net> <39F6E5CE.3179C81F@my-deja.com> <8t9bpq$dng$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F84080.28C3F4E3@my-deja.com> <l9ZJ5.254$Rc6.25682@news1.cableinet.net> <8tadrg$b3d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F92280.600A277A@my-deja.com> <8tbd91$4c2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F9535C.3BD8B15A@my-deja.com> <8tbm5j$ahq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F9664A.8AF3067E@my-deja.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fea0e,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gidfea0e,public X-Google-Thread: 10b88a,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b88a,public X-Google-Thread: 10b574,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b574,public X-Google-Thread: f6783,cf6971c789d68a89 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6783,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2000-10-27 05:30:12 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!hermes.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!xfer10.netnews.com!netnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail From: seajays@my-deja.com Newsgroups: eunet.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.misc Subject: Re: new powers for employers to read employees' email Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:24:06 GMT Organization: Deja.com - Before you buy. Lines: 46 Message-ID: <8tbs52$eqb$1@nnrp1.deja.com> References: <kqgavso9d8ugqufmkcveqqj71t8je4sv6e@4ax.com> <8t3g8p$aj$2@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t3pjt$qte$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <8t3qti$bp$1@wallace.stir.ac.uk> <8t4alc$98a$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <CbpJ5.3584$MK5.360545@news1.cableinet.net> <8t6805$sbv$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <u1BJ5.4475$MK5.452604@news1.cableinet.net> <39F6E5CE.3179C81F@my-deja.com> <8t9bpq$dng$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F84080.28C3F4E3@my-deja.com> <l9ZJ5.254$Rc6.25682@news1.cableinet.net> <8tadrg$b3d$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F92280.600A277A@my-deja.com> <8tbd91$4c2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F9535C.3BD8B15A@my-deja.com> <8tbm5j$ahq$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <39F9664A.8AF3067E@my-deja.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.247.87.172 X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Oct 27 12:24:06 2000 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) via <B>Avirt Gateway Server</B> v4.0 X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x59.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 194.247.87.172 X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDseajays