Article View: eye.general
Article #17Re: EYENET: The rise/fall/rebirth of IO
From: karl mamer
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1995 00:00
36 lines
2548 bytes
2548 bytes
geoff@zswamp.UUCP (Geoffrey Welsh) writes: > eye@interlog.com writes: > > This is the story of the > > rise and fall of Toronto's first and most unique ISP. > > Hardly the first. ONet was providing internet service to selected Toronto- > area organizations long before IO and probably deserves the title of > "Toronto's first internet service provider". If you meant affordable to the > individual, say it... don't make misleading statements. Seems a matter of semantics. Maybe he should have said "consumer". The implication was there. > > In the archaic days of 1993, Toronto's only commercial "Internet > > provider" was CRS -- which offered a pathetically bad PCBoard > > interface to netnews and email. > > Ignoring the fact that this statement contradicts the one above, how could > Canada Remote Systems be "Toronto's only commercial Internet provider" when > they obtained their services from of UUNET Canada, the organization probably > best deserving the title "Toronto's first commercial Internet provider". You'll notice Internet provider is in quotes. In english, that implies "Ummm, like, almost, sorta, but not quite." A BBS that provides news and mail isn't really an ISP, or at least an ISP as most people would think of one. One could also describe Boeing as a commerical consumer plane maker, you just have to have $25 million to buy one of their planes. UUnet doesn't quite offer connectivity charges at a consumer level. Do they offer dial-up slip/ppp? What do they charge for UCCP? $6 an hour? -- An answer from spam devoid of any real intelligence or a human idea. Chilly toes now frequently reclaim blanket space once stolen by your wife. Chatting with breakfast cereal imprisons me within a creeping sense that this sig line makes no sense. Software. TORONTO...karl mamer... <kamamer@io.org> Pizza, eh?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<49ce3a$hlq@ionews.io.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<492sc1$kvf@gold.interlog.com> <951125.132225.0X0.rnr.w165w@zswamp.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1016e8,c567549beeb74410 X-Google-Attributes: gid1016e8,public X-Google-Thread: 10643c,c567549beeb74410 X-Google-Attributes: gid10643c,public X-Google-Thread: 10aaae,c567549beeb74410 X-Google-Attributes: gid10aaae,public From: kamamer@io.org (karl mamer) Subject: Re: EYENET: The rise/fall/rebirth of IO Date: 1995/11/27 Message-ID: <49ce3a$hlq@ionews.io.org> X-Deja-AN: 120211818 references: <492sc1$kvf@gold.interlog.com> <951125.132225.0X0.rnr.w165w@zswamp.UUCP> organization: Internex Online, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (416 363 3783) newsgroups: eye.general,tor.general,can.infohighway