Article View: fa.editor-p
Article #105Undo
From: ucbvaxCADARPAVAXC70editor-people
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1982 16:18
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1982 16:18
17 lines
1059 bytes
1059 bytes
>From ZIMMER@DEC-MARLBORO Fri Feb 5 16:12:46 1982 The prototype version of Etude allowed a single-step undo. Everything could be undone except for file manipulation operations. The underlying implementation could have handled a multiple-step undo, but the user interface didn't handle it. Single-step undo isn't sufficient for good error recovery; see the example of "edit" in Bravo mentioned a few messages ago. The questions about how to do multiple-step undo are good. We really need some experimental evidence to guide us in this area. Undo is handy not only as an error-correction aid, but also as a way to encourage people to experiment with a system. When someone asks "What does this do?" you can say "Try it; if you don't like it you can always undo it." This approach was used in Etude's tutorial. --------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<anews.Aucb.379>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!CAD:ARPAVAX:C70:editor-peopleShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!CAD:ARPAVAX:C70:editor-people From: ucbvax!CAD:ARPAVAX:C70:editor-people Newsgroups: fa.editor-p Subject: Undo Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1982 16:18:45 +0000 Message-ID: <anews.Aucb.379>