Article View: fa.editor-p
Article #139re: Concurrent access (jcwinterton)
From: ucbvaxC70editor-people
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1982 04:11
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1982 04:11
8 lines
652 bytes
652 bytes
>From rubin@Sri-Nsc11 Sat Mar 6 01:00:15 1982 Good point. There could be a security problem in telling a lock requester the ID of a lock holder. It would probably be sufficient, then, just to tell the lock holder of the requested access, and give him the same options I mentioned earlier; the requester would simply be told to "Wait, checking access. . ." (of course, he would abort if he decides not to wait). --Darryl
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<anews.Aucb.611>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!C70:editor-peopleShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!C70:editor-people From: ucbvax!C70:editor-people Newsgroups: fa.editor-p Subject: re: Concurrent access (jcwinterton) Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1982 04:11:05 +0000 Message-ID: <anews.Aucb.611>