On UUCP <-> ARPA Mail Traffic

Article View: fa.info-cpm

Article #784

#784

From: utzoodecvaxucbvaxinfo-cpm
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1982 12:52

17 lines
1213 bytes

>From W8SDZ@Mit-Mc  Thu Dec 23 12:51:45 1982
To: mike@BRL
Cc: POURNE@Mit-Mc, anton.Hcr@BRL, Gurus@BRL, Info-Cpm@BRL
In-Reply-To: The message of 21 Dec 1982  19:31-EST from EB
Via:  Mit-Mc; 23 Dec 82 5:37-EST
Via:  Brl; 23 Dec 82 5:53-EST
Via:  Brl-Bmd; 23 Dec 82 6:02-EST

If what you say is true then why are CSNET people allowed to send and
receive mail to Arpanet?  It seems to me that Arpa has benefited
GREATLY from information supplied by non-Arpa people through these
gateways.  Someone needs to re-examine the "official position".  That
automatic gateway rejection shouldn't be there.  It's not on UCB-C70.
It seems to me that this is one person's interpretation of the
regulations.  If you want to take them seriously, then shut down the
UCB-C70 and CSNET gateways.  But if you do, you'll shut off a valuable
resource.  I don't think the management would appreciate that at all.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <bnews.ucbvax.489>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!info-cpm
Newsgroups: fa.info-cpm
Title: On UUCP <-> ARPA Mail Traffic
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.489
Posted: Thu Dec 23 12:52:05 1982
Received: Fri Dec 24 06:37:52 1982
Subject: On UUCP <-> ARPA Mail Traffic
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1982 12:52:05 +0000
Message-ID: <bnews.ucbvax.489>