Re: subnet addresses

Article View: fa.tcp-ip

Article #362

#362

From: tcp-ip
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1985 02:49

6 lines
777 bytes

From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <JNC@MIT-XX.ARPA>

	I think there are as many sites with subnet FF in use as there
are with 0. I don't see that migrating hosts out of the potential subnet
0 before turning subnetting on is a big deal.
-------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9468@ucbvax.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!ucbvax!tcp-ip

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!ucbvax!tcp-ip
From: tcp-ip@ucbvax.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: subnet addresses
Message-ID: <9468@ucbvax.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 29-Jul-85 22:49:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.9468
Posted: Mon Jul 29 22:49:38 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 06:27:28 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 6