Article View: fa.tcp-ip
Article #368Re: subnet addresses
From: tcp-ip
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1985 15:35
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1985 15:35
9 lines
853 bytes
853 bytes
From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <JNC@MIT-XX.ARPA> Mark, I don't understand what you think you are disputing. It is perfectly legal for any network *without subnets* to have 0's in any part of the 'rest' field. Nobody ever said otherwise. I was only discussing the case where subnets *were* in use. Noel -------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9476@ucbvax.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!ucbvax!tcp-ipShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!dual!ucbvax!tcp-ip From: tcp-ip@ucbvax.ARPA Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip Subject: Re: subnet addresses Message-ID: <9476@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Tue, 30-Jul-85 11:35:44 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.9476 Posted: Tue Jul 30 11:35:44 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 1-Aug-85 06:34:26 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 9