re: Class B networks vs. Class C networks

Article View: fa.tcp-ip

Article #436

#436

From: POSTEL
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1985 23:30

7 lines
705 bytes

Jon Solomon:

Please consider the subnetting procedure described in RFC 950.

--jon.
-------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <8509140043.AA07658@UCB-VAX.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!usc-isib.arpa!POSTEL

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!usc-isib.arpa!POSTEL
From: POSTEL@USC-ISIB.ARPA
Newsgroups: fa.tcp-ip
Subject: re: Class B networks vs. Class C networks
Message-ID: <8509140043.AA07658@UCB-VAX.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 13-Sep-85 19:30:39 EDT
Article-I.D.: UCB-VAX.8509140043.AA07658
Posted: Fri Sep 13 19:30:39 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Sep-85 08:16:40 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA
Reply-To: tcp-ip@ucb-vax.arpa
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 7