Article View: fa.telecom
Article #33Re: 1+ dialing and area codes
From: Carl Moore, VLD/VMB
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1985 19:21
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 1985 19:21
12 lines
1336 bytes
1336 bytes
But does 1603893 from Lawrence, MA get Salem, NH now? Local service from Newark, Del. picks up 2 prefixes in 215 area in Pa. (255 Kemblesville and 274 Landenberg). 1+ one of these Pa. prefixes gets error recording (i.e. no 255 or 274 in Del., area 302). 274 was/is "protected" anyway because it's local to Wilmington (where 302-478 in Talleyville area did not require 1+ as a of a few years ago). 1215 + one of these Pa. prefixes should go thru, but probably has to go thru more equipment. 0+ calls do require the area code. FROM those 2 Pa. prefixes: 368 and 453 are Newark, Del.; 1368 is Lansdale, Pa.; 1453 is Perkasie, Pa. (recent!). (The oldest Newark prefix is 302- 368, as I noted in this Digest very recently.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8510100237.AA08623@UCB-VAX.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!brl.arpa!cmooreShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ucbvax!brl.arpa!cmoore From: cmoore@BRL.ARPA (Carl Moore, VLD/VMB) Newsgroups: fa.telecom Subject: Re: 1+ dialing and area codes Message-ID: <8510100237.AA08623@UCB-VAX.ARPA> Date: Wed, 9-Oct-85 15:21:27 EDT Article-I.D.: UCB-VAX.8510100237.AA08623 Posted: Wed Oct 9 15:21:27 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 15:59:49 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.ARPA Reply-To: telecom@ucb-vax.arpa Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 12