Article View: fa.works
Article #116Apollo
From: ucbvaxworks
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1982 23:44
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1982 23:44
23 lines
1434 bytes
1434 bytes
>From BUSH@Usc-Isie Tue Mar 9 07:01:39 1982
Date: 6-Mar-82 1600-EST
From: Nathaniel Mishkin <Mishkin.YALE>
Subject: Re: Innovation
The window problem is a typical example of Apollo's approach.
I'm sure they wanted the whole zippy window thing from the start. ...
I believe it is typical. I've been working with the Apollos for almost a year
and I happen to know that Apollo was unfamiliar with the Alto when they
designed and implemented their original display manager. I wish they had taken
more time and looked around more before releasing their system. A la PR1ME,
they produced an initial product as quickly as possible, and have since refined
it (with the aid of substantial user feedback). Xerox, on the other hand (with
considerably greater resources) refined the Star before releasing it. I also
wish the system were more flexible (in the general direction of the Lisp
machine). Currently, for example, you either use the Apollo display manager
in its entirety, or write your own. There is no way, for example, to replace
the display manager's editor with your own. Assuredly, the product will
mature, but it could be less restrictive and could easily have been more
mature to begin with.
-------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<anews.Aucbvax.6475>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!worksShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works From: ucbvax!works Newsgroups: fa.works Subject: Apollo Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1982 23:44:51 +0000 Message-ID: <anews.Aucbvax.6475>