🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: fa.works
Article #134

TOPS-20 EXEC

#134
From: ucbvaxworks
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1982 19:34
17 lines
1165 bytes
>From Joe.Newcomer@Cmu-10a Thu Mar 11 12:25:58 1982
The last I looked, DEC was nut fussy at all about releasing the source code
to the EXEC; for a modest number of dollars you can get a source license
but I don't know if that is a site license or a processor license.  Modest
is under $10K, which on a typical $750,000 KL20 just ain't all that much
additional.

One major difference between Unix and TOPS-20 is that on Unix I felt a
compulsion to rewrite the shell because it was so bad, but never had the
time to engage in the compulsion.  I would like to do a few tweaks on
the TOPS-20 EXEC, which has it s own  problems, but they are not a
major departure from the basic philosophy of the TOPS-20 EXEC.  In the
case of Unix, I would never have considered using the shell code at all,
except possibly to see how some bizarre interface to the kernel was done.
It is such a poor piece ofinterface that I found it a constant aggravation
every time I typed a command.
					joe
Technical Details
Message-ID: <anews.Aucbvax.6519>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works
From: ucbvax!works
Newsgroups: fa.works
Subject: TOPS-20 EXEC
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1982 19:34:27 +0000
Message-ID: <anews.Aucbvax.6519>