Article View: fa.works
Article #143Xerox and WorkS discussion
From: ucbvax!LLOYD
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1981 17:22
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1981 17:22
9 lines
622 bytes
622 bytes
I can understand Mr. Liddle's unease about discussing his product in a public forum like WorkS. Dissemination of information by Xerox employees could be misconstrued as advertising. The solution is for a 'disinterested' third party (who happens to be on WorkS) to place questions before appropriate Xerox folk and report his/her findings back to the list. Let's be constructive instead of petty. Brian
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<anews.Aucbvax.1886>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!duke!decvax!ucbvax!LLOYD@MIT-AIShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!duke!decvax!ucbvax!LLOYD@MIT-AI From: ucbvax!LLOYD@MIT-AI Newsgroups: fa.works Subject: Xerox and WorkS discussion Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1981 17:22:31 +0000 Message-ID: <anews.Aucbvax.1886>