Article View: fa.works
Article #54Re: UNIX & Workstations & Networking ...
From: ucbvaxworks
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1982 20:03
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1982 20:03
19 lines
1108 bytes
1108 bytes
>From lwa.mit-csr@BRL Mon Feb 22 09:09:36 1982 With respect to uniform network protocol standards: HEAR! HEAR! Our experience here at MIT has been that interconnecting network HARDWARE is (relatively) easy. We have two different ringnets, an experimental (ie 3 Mbaud) Ethernet, Chaosnet, and of course Arpanet, and it is possible to forward packets among all of them. Unfortunately, there are almost as many network protocols as networks, and it appears that protocol translation is a very difficult problem. Protocol standardization within an organization is, of course, as much a political and administrative problem as a technical one. Each of the available network protocols has its own technical advantages and disadvantages. Also, writing network software seems to require a great deal of time and manpower, so I don't expect the situation to improve very quickly. -------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<anews.Aucbvax.6260>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!worksShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!works From: ucbvax!works Newsgroups: fa.works Subject: Re: UNIX & Workstations & Networking ... Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1982 20:03:33 +0000 Message-ID: <anews.Aucbvax.6260>