Article View: fj.education.math
Article #43Test-Cheating Prevention
From: jonhays
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:10
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:10
49 lines
3891 bytes
3891 bytes
A cheating scandal has besmirched the U. S. Naval Academy and Virginia Military Academy and other institutions. As a teacher of more than 30 years, I primarily blame this on the teachers. (Agree? Or disagree?) For I early learned how to formulate cheat-proof tests. In 1955, I began teaching mathematics and physics at Inter American University of Puerto Rico, San GermΓ‘n, PR. I soon discovered that many students depended upon little rolled-up cribs. I announced that, out of concern for their eyesight, I'd, henceforth, give open-book exams with a different version for each student. (No! "Open-book" is not permissive! I'd want any person working for me to look up critical formulas and constants. Besides, by not depending upon memorization, I could give them more difficult problems than otherwise.) I not only gave different exams to each student, but, during a trial period, I gave different homework assignments. Some colleagues complained that homework was optional in my class (for reasons soon disclosed). I was assigned an assistant to help grade papers, so I embarked upon a five-week experiment. Each student in an "Elementary Algebra" class received five different homework problems each class session. After four weeks, my two best students begged for mercy. "Sir, we've been doing the homework for most of the students. And it's killing us! Our girl friends are mad because we never have time for them. And our parents are mad because we never come home weekends. Please, Sir, can you stop this?" "I thought so. Some of these students don't even know how to copy correctly. I've proven my point. So I'm stopping required homework. And I'm not punishing you any more. I think you've had your punishment." (In October, 1997, a controversy developed in Fairfax County, where we lived, when a GRADING SYSTEM was introduced which was based purely on tests, ignoring HOMEWORK partially or totally. Parents -- many of whom had, no doubt, done some of the homework -- objected this is "unfair". My example above suggests that CHEATING ON HOMEWORK MAY BE GREATER THAN ON TESTS! Even if to a LESSER DEGREE, it could contribute AS MUCH OR MORE because of the LARGE HOMEWORK TO TESTS RATIO.) I accomplished this with only typewriter and mimeograph machine. It would be much easier with today's technology. It's easy to insert a formula in a computer program which generates hundreds of sets of different numbers, placing them in blanks on an exam template. For non-numerical variation, a computer program could select different synonyms or different sentence forms to make each version unique. In 1970, at the time of the "Apollo 13" voyage (when astronauts escaped annililation), I gave a statistics final to 121 students at the U. of Maine (at Orono), each with totally different numbers. I value your opinion about my opinion.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1110989451.942133.226060@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 1065a2,c7e5997e555a4da8,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1065a2,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "jonhays" <haysjohnva@hotmail.com> Newsgroups: fj.education.math Subject: Test-Cheating Prevention Date: 16 Mar 2005 08:10:51 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 50 Message-ID: <1110989451.942133.226060@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 165.247.83.55 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1110989457 8364 127.0.0.1 (16 Mar 2005 16:10:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:10:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/0.2 Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=165.247.83.55; posting-account=o5qPiQ0AAADPK1SdkxErDmDKlM3jdpJ3