Article View: fj.lang.c
Article #166Re: Which class library is better?
From: Hirayama
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:10
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:10
22 lines
1741 bytes
1741 bytes
>LEDA $B$r>R2p$7$?(B, $B$_$J$_(B$B$N!wBg:eEEDLBg$G$9!#(B
>> $B!&#L#E#D#A(B (Library of Efficient Data types and Algorithms)
>$B$3$l$N(B version 2.1 $B$N%^%K%e%"%k$G$h$1$l$PF|K\8l%^%K%e%"%k$,$"(B
>$B$j$^$9!#(B
$B$"!"$=$s$J$N$"$k$N$G$9$+!"@'Hs!9!9!#<B$O!"(Bversion 3.0$B$r4{$K(B
$B%$%s%9%H!<%k(B$B$7$F$$$?$j$7$^$9!#!J%F%s%W%l!<%H%P!<%8%g%s!K(B
>$B$*$d$j$K$J$j$?$$$3$H$K(B$B$O$A$g$C$HIT8~$-$+$b$7$l$^$;$s!#(B
>libg++ $BImB0$N%/%i%9$rN.MQ$9$k$+!"$=$l(B$B$K<j$r2C$($k$+!"(Bscratch
>$B$+$i=q$/$+$7$?$[$&$,<j$C<h$jAa$$$+$b$7$l$^$;$s(B$B$M!#(B
$B$I$&$b$"$j$,$H$&$4$6$$$^$9!#(B(_ _)
--
$B!?(B hirayama@oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp
$B!]!]!a!a!a".".".!|".".".!a!a!a!]!](B $BAa0pEDBg3X1!M}(B$B9)3X8&5f2JEE5$9)3X@l96(B
$B!?"#(B $B3^868&(B $B=$;N#1G/(B $BJ?;3(B $BD>5*(B
$B"'(B $B8&5f<<(B03-3209-6323
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<HIRAYAMA.92Dec17141016@hp4.oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!toumon!toumon!hirayamaReferences:
<HIRAYAMA.92Dec16184446@hp4.oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp> <HRY.92Dec17001945@belial.osakac.ac.jp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: fj.lang.c Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!toumon!toumon!hirayama From: hirayama@oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp (Hirayama) Subject: Re: Which class library is better? In-Reply-To: hry@belial.osakac.ac.jp's message of 16 Dec 92 15:19:45 GMT X-Nntp-Posting-Host: hp4.oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp Message-ID: <HIRAYAMA.92Dec17141016@hp4.oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp> Followup-To: fj.lang.c Sender: news@toumon.waseda.ac.jp (News Maintainer) Organization: Narita-Kasahara Lab., Department of Electric Engineering, School of Science and Engineering, WASEDA University References: <HIRAYAMA.92Dec16184446@hp4.oscar.info.waseda.ac.jp> <HRY.92Dec17001945@belial.osakac.ac.jp> Distribution: fj Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:10:16 GMT Lines: 22