Article View: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Article #309Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question
From: jbennett
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:37
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:37
17 lines
1124 bytes
1124 bytes
In article <1992Sep11.121830.17069@hubcap.clemson.edu>, zilla@nj.nec.com (John Lewis) writes: |> Someone told me that the SGI multiprocessor machines cannot run |> different unix processes on different processors; I think someone was pulling your leg. Of course our multiprocessors an do this, it is the easiest style to implement. |> they can only |> run a single (but possibly parallelized) process at a given time. |> The reason was said to be that the machines do not implement |> any mechanism for simultaneous writes. I assume he meant writes to memory. Most memory is single ported, for cost reasons, but there is dedicated memory per processor at higher levels in the memory hierarchy. Jim Bennett (bennett@sgi.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<315405@nttlab.ntt.JP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-snd-ss2!akiu!hakata!kyu-cs!lab!nttlab!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-snd-ss2!akiu!hakata!kyu-cs!lab!nttlab!daemon From: jbennett@sylow.esd.sgi.com Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel Subject: Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question Message-ID: <315405@nttlab.ntt.JP> Date: 11 Sep 92 19:37:51 GMT Sender: news@nttlab.ntt.JP Distribution: fj Lines: 17 Approved: news@nttlab.ntt