🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Article #309

Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question

#309
From: jbennett
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 19:37
17 lines
1124 bytes
In article <1992Sep11.121830.17069@hubcap.clemson.edu>,
zilla@nj.nec.com (John Lewis) writes:
|> Someone told me that the SGI multiprocessor machines cannot run
|> different unix processes on different processors;

I think someone was pulling your leg.  Of course our multiprocessors
an do this, it is the easiest style to implement.
|> they can only
|> run a single (but possibly parallelized) process at a given time.
|> The reason was said to be that the machines do not implement
|> any mechanism for simultaneous writes.

I assume he meant writes to memory.  Most memory is single ported,
for cost reasons, but there is dedicated memory per processor at
higher levels in the memory hierarchy.

Jim Bennett		(bennett@sgi.com) 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <315405@nttlab.ntt.JP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-snd-ss2!akiu!hakata!kyu-cs!lab!nttlab!daemon

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-snd-ss2!akiu!hakata!kyu-cs!lab!nttlab!daemon
From: jbennett@sylow.esd.sgi.com
Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Subject: Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question
Message-ID: <315405@nttlab.ntt.JP>
Date: 11 Sep 92 19:37:51 GMT
Sender: news@nttlab.ntt.JP
Distribution: fj
Lines: 17
Approved: news@nttlab.ntt