Article View: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Article #316Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question
From: Bent Hagemark
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 12:30
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 12:30
24 lines
1486 bytes
1486 bytes
In article <1992Sep11.121830.17069@hubcap.clemson.edu> zilla@nj.nec.com (John Lewis) writes: >Someone told me that the SGI multiprocessor machines cannot run >different unix processes on different processors; they can only >run a single (but possibly parallelized) process at a given time. Someone told you very wrong. All processors peruse the run queue. Any process runs on any processor unless you explicitly assign a process to a processor and/or restrict a processor to run only certain processes. >The reason was said to be that the machines do not implement >any mechanism for simultaneous writes. > >Is this correct? If so, how are simultaneous writes from >different threads of a parallelized process prevented? Simultaneous writes from different threads of a parallized process are not prevented. (Threads are known to the kernel and each has its own pid, kernel supported stack, etc). Harware spinlocks are avaliable to user-level programs directly or through a couple of different MP programming interfaces to provide serialization if that's desired. Bent
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<315503@nttlab.ntt.JP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!etl.go.jp!gama!lab!nttlab!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!etl.go.jp!gama!lab!nttlab!daemon From: bh@nissen.asd.sgi.com (Bent Hagemark) Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel Subject: Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question Message-ID: <315503@nttlab.ntt.JP> Date: 14 Sep 92 12:30:41 GMT Sender: daemon@nttlab.ntt.JP Distribution: fj Lines: 24 Approved: news@nttlab.ntt