Article View: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Article #319Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question
From: David R. Emberson
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 12:31
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 12:31
22 lines
1548 bytes
1548 bytes
In article <1992Sep11.121830.17069@hubcap.clemson.edu>, zilla@nj.nec.com (John Lewis) writes: > Someone told me that the SGI multiprocessor machines cannot run > different unix processes on different processors; they can only > run a single (but possibly parallelized) process at a given time. > The reason was said to be that the machines do not implement > any mechanism for simultaneous writes. > > Is this correct? If so, how are simultaneous writes from > different threads of a parallelized process prevented? > > Is the new sun multiprocessor (4/690?) similar? This sounds bogus to me. All Sun MP machines (4/6xx, SS10, and futures) can run different processes simultaneously and also run parallelized codes. I think your friend is confusing "simultaneous writes" with synchronization. I believe the SGI machines do something funky to implement barriers (like put them in a special portion of memory with hardware support) because the R3000 has no synchronization primitives. This is not a problem on the Suns since Sparc has the hooks in the architecture. R4000 fixes this omission. Dave Emberson dre@Eng.Sun.COM
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<315507@nttlab.ntt.JP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!etl.go.jp!gama!lab!nttlab!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-tyo-news!etl.go.jp!gama!lab!nttlab!daemon From: dre@ember.Eng.Sun.COM (David R. Emberson) Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel Subject: Re: sgi/sun shared memory machines question Message-ID: <315507@nttlab.ntt.JP> Date: 14 Sep 92 12:31:16 GMT Sender: daemon@nttlab.ntt.JP Distribution: fj Lines: 22 Approved: news@nttlab.ntt