Article View: fj.mail-lists.parallel
Article #408Re: Synchonizing watches
From: Leo Dagum
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 20:21
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 20:21
23 lines
1217 bytes
1217 bytes
In article <1992Sep3.123226.14205@hubcap.clemson.edu> steve@hubcap.clemson.edu ("Steve" Stevenson) writes:
>[I saw this on sci.logic. I thought it was a nice problem for this group.
> steve]
>>From: dougs@tvnews.tv.tek.com (Doug Stevens)
>>Message-ID: <1992Sep1.234452.26917@tvnews.tv.tek.com>
>
>[....]
Unless I'm missing something, this is fairly straightforward.
1) A zeroes watch, calls B and hangs up.
2) B waits till phone ends ringing then calls A and hangs up.
3) B calls A again and hangs up.
4) A times the first call back, and now knows (AB + BA), when he gets
the second call back, he now knows BA as well (and therefore AB).
5) A sets his watch back by AB, and calls B
6) B picks up the phone and zeroes his watch, they now have (approximately)
synchronized watches.
7) Bob's your uncle.
Leo Dagum
NASA Ames Reseach Center
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<314914@nttlab.ntt.JP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-snd-ss2!akiu!hakata!kyu-cs!lab!nttlab!daemonShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!sh.wide!wnoc-snd-ss2!akiu!hakata!kyu-cs!lab!nttlab!daemon From: leo@nas.nasa.gov (Leo Dagum) Newsgroups: fj.mail-lists.parallel Subject: Re: Synchonizing watches Message-ID: <314914@nttlab.ntt.JP> Date: 3 Sep 92 20:21:56 GMT Sender: daemon@nttlab.ntt.JP Distribution: fj Lines: 23 Approved: news@nttlab.ntt